📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10
📝 Original message:On Monday 10. August 2015 12.53.33 Leo Wandersleb via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > The reason of it being faster makes no sense, as your example the channel
> > has been open for a month then he really doesn't care it takes 1, 10 or
> > 50 blocks before his transaction is included. What is 5 hours wait on a
> > month of profit?
>
> I guess the assumption here is a full-block scenario where users of LN would
> be willing to pay 100 times the fees users of crude transactions would be
> willing to pay for the same limited space in the blockchain, simply because
> LN would group 100 real world payments into 1 crude transaction.
Thats exactly what I argued makes no sense to me.
Why pay for something you don't need? Paying something Just because you have
money is really not a good business strategy. I doubt that will happen.
--
Thomas Zander
Thomas Zander [ARCHIVE] /
npub1du…vyg93
2023-06-07 15:46:32
in reply to nevent1q…en82
Author Public Key
npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93Published at
2023-06-07 15:46:32Event JSON
{
"id": "8de50cbc61183d5f6237382b312ac4110d75ab1635b347613d7f232d3eac43da",
"pubkey": "6f226bd1c86c22aed12ec82cd2dab4b5e2f77fd662ac4e1f881170a12da87bd6",
"created_at": 1686152792,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"41b51823afdaa24b72f4ee2d7a4a92c67b0a681c7bc2f157674aec4c3d3f0b15",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6d845a61f479f79c46ede4177333c53c82df97331f7292553f58150560532b8e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"8ff17ddc5c3e18aa20cec5a13d489b9fd9fe4442bd7a2a77b1bf8a5cb08ed59a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10\n📝 Original message:On Monday 10. August 2015 12.53.33 Leo Wandersleb via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e The reason of it being faster makes no sense, as your example the channel\n\u003e \u003e has been open for a month then he really doesn't care it takes 1, 10 or\n\u003e \u003e 50 blocks before his transaction is included. What is 5 hours wait on a\n\u003e \u003e month of profit?\n\u003e\n\u003e I guess the assumption here is a full-block scenario where users of LN would\n\u003e be willing to pay 100 times the fees users of crude transactions would be\n\u003e willing to pay for the same limited space in the blockchain, simply because\n\u003e LN would group 100 real world payments into 1 crude transaction.\n\nThats exactly what I argued makes no sense to me.\n\nWhy pay for something you don't need? Paying something Just because you have \nmoney is really not a good business strategy. I doubt that will happen.\n\n-- \nThomas Zander",
"sig": "0d6d714f19ad11f70f0ac814fbece080ff284f80f3ccb4f33764f64acec0fb4e0a1d6b0bbf94507a68969e4ae5f8158e53997565ae0677aedcf2b4281752bb4b"
}