📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19
📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at gmail.com> wrote:
> bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core
> discussion?
Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,
and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so
long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.
The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss
a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty
low volume in any case.
> As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time with
> little use.
I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev
that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC
we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to
move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit
chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.
We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by
offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It
just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.
Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a
decision now.
Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use
sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on
linuxfoundation?
ping @Warren.
Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1lh…zg7ed
2023-06-07 17:37:05
in reply to nevent1q…q7qc
Author Public Key
npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7edSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:37:05Event JSON
{
"id": "8f95daabf56fe5b89fc7ad3cfb0160e2d51f586cc15d39b079588133f4a54fa4",
"pubkey": "fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83",
"created_at": 1686159425,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5587f4ee7133a2208ecf01994db3230c769341f0a1c16d35bd2a8b755ea618f4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c234fdd1e89354155db9e65c7cf76fb9487c186f4d0dcad2e6a372b3d8b55249",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core\n\u003e discussion?\n\nWell -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,\nand establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so\nlong as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.\nThe risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss\na discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty\nlow volume in any case.\n\n\u003e As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time with\n\u003e little use.\n\nI would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev\nthat would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC\nwe regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to\nmove to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit\nchat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.\n\nWe could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by\noffloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It\njust needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.\nEspecially if the list already exists, we should consider making a\ndecision now.\n\nWho are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use\nsourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on\nlinuxfoundation?\n\nping @Warren.",
"sig": "0f4020e9d24b9e221bf12c47320849e25b32e756c6bdfd20c8b1019133c2c6bbedbaa8c73ce62801b4830f118ee899c8024e3aa96eb3e710d8af03a053aeb1c5"
}