Not to mention all the #WaterConsumption! There are plans to restart aging nuclear reactor as well as untested SMR reactors! Will #AI’s huge energy demands spur a #nuclear renaissance?
By Davide Castelvecchi
25 October 2024
Do small modular reactors carry extra risks?
"In some cases, small modular reactors 'could actually push nuclear power in a more dangerous direction', says #EdwinLyman. 'Advanced isn’t always better.'
"In particular, Lyman points out that the pebble-bed designs drawn up by #XEnergy and #Kairos would rely on high-assay low-enriched #uranium (#HALEU), which comprises 10–20% uranium-235 — compared with the 5% enrichment level required by most existing reactors (and by #NuScale’s reactor). HALEU is still classified as low-enrichment fuel (as opposed to the highly enriched uranium used to make nuclear bombs), but that distinction is misleading, Lyman says. In June, he and his collaborators — including physicist Richard Garwin, who led the design of the first hydrogen bomb — warned in a Science article that a bomb could be built with a few hundred kilograms of HALEU, with no need for further enrichment.
"Smaller reactors are also likely to produce more nuclear waste and to use fuel less efficiently, according to work reported in 2022 by Macfarlane and her collaborators. In a full-size reactor, most of the neutrons produced by the splitting of uranium travel through a large volume of fuel, meaning that they have a high probability of hitting another nucleus, rather than colliding with the walls of the reactor vessel or escaping into the surrounding building. 'When you shrink the reactor, there’s less material in there, so you will have more neutron leakage,' Macfarlane says. These rogue neutrons can be absorbed by other atomic nuclei — which would then themselves become radioactive."
Original article:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03490-3
Archived version:
https://archive.ph/mODpF#selection-952.0-991.164
#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Cryptocurrency #DataCenters #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NoNukes #NuclearHype #NeutronEmbrittlement #NuclearWaste #NotCarbonFree
DoomsdaysCW /
npub1sa…5jgxu
2024-10-27 21:51:31
Author Public Key
npub1sancp758qz9pm2yq4yd2nwqdvhkeuekwd5kk8g4hylvkfxfcf3tqs5jgxuPublished at
2024-10-27 21:51:31Event JSON
{
"id": "89560c149f29c543538a606993e5334cc0bb4709d8ec76601276f7d1924e4f23",
"pubkey": "876780fa87008a1da880a91aa9b80d65ed9e66ce6d2d63a2b727d96499384c56",
"created_at": 1730065891,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"rethinknotrestart"
],
[
"t",
"notcarbonfree"
],
[
"t",
"nuscale"
],
[
"t",
"waterconsumption"
],
[
"t",
"nonukes"
],
[
"t",
"datacenters"
],
[
"t",
"uranium"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://kolektiva.social/@DoomsdaysCW/113381598292963352",
"web"
],
[
"t",
"nuclearwaste"
],
[
"t",
"edwinlyman"
],
[
"t",
"ai"
],
[
"t",
"neutronembrittlement"
],
[
"t",
"cryptocurrency"
],
[
"t",
"nuclearhype"
],
[
"t",
"nuclear"
],
[
"t",
"kairos"
],
[
"t",
"haleu"
],
[
"t",
"xenergy"
],
[
"t",
"nonukesforai"
],
[
"t",
"artificialintelligence"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://kolektiva.social/users/DoomsdaysCW/statuses/113381598292963352",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://kolektiva.social/users/DoomsdaysCW/statuses/113381598292963352",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Not to mention all the #WaterConsumption! There are plans to restart aging nuclear reactor as well as untested SMR reactors! Will #AI’s huge energy demands spur a #nuclear renaissance? \n\n By Davide Castelvecchi\n 25 October 2024\n\nDo small modular reactors carry extra risks? \n\n\"In some cases, small modular reactors 'could actually push nuclear power in a more dangerous direction', says #EdwinLyman. 'Advanced isn’t always better.'\n\n\"In particular, Lyman points out that the pebble-bed designs drawn up by #XEnergy and #Kairos would rely on high-assay low-enriched #uranium (#HALEU), which comprises 10–20% uranium-235 — compared with the 5% enrichment level required by most existing reactors (and by #NuScale’s reactor). HALEU is still classified as low-enrichment fuel (as opposed to the highly enriched uranium used to make nuclear bombs), but that distinction is misleading, Lyman says. In June, he and his collaborators — including physicist Richard Garwin, who led the design of the first hydrogen bomb — warned in a Science article that a bomb could be built with a few hundred kilograms of HALEU, with no need for further enrichment. \n\n\"Smaller reactors are also likely to produce more nuclear waste and to use fuel less efficiently, according to work reported in 2022 by Macfarlane and her collaborators. In a full-size reactor, most of the neutrons produced by the splitting of uranium travel through a large volume of fuel, meaning that they have a high probability of hitting another nucleus, rather than colliding with the walls of the reactor vessel or escaping into the surrounding building. 'When you shrink the reactor, there’s less material in there, so you will have more neutron leakage,' Macfarlane says. These rogue neutrons can be absorbed by other atomic nuclei — which would then themselves become radioactive.\"\n\nOriginal article:\nhttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03490-3\n\nArchived version:\nhttps://archive.ph/mODpF#selection-952.0-991.164 \n\n#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Cryptocurrency #DataCenters #RethinkNotRestart #NoNukesForAI #NoNukes #NuclearHype #NeutronEmbrittlement #NuclearWaste #NotCarbonFree",
"sig": "594829e463ec3eb0253c9acd403fbecbd8cdf64c37a4a2db217b20e5a0bcf9b5bfa768918f9dfb5f9b4ad5fd328b92f759933283fa254c9810ed009554f75fa9"
}