š
Original date posted:2022-05-25
š Original message:i like the 00 || X_spend || X_scan + mandate address reuse prevention.
might as well start with something strict
easy to loosen it later - if needed - harder to tighten it later because of
back-compatibility with addresses in-use
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:02 AM alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi woltx,
>
> Thanks for implementing silent payments in Bitcoin Core. I tried the steps
> shared in tutorial and everything works as expected.
>
> I have updated the silent payment address (signet) as TXT record for
> domain alice.silentbitco.in
>
> $ dig -t txt alice.silentbitco.in +short
> "tb1px3kma8e8y8z9l7e640v0x2chzrzww9cu06mqvwyrz805ffletu3s067sgh"
>
> I have also added basic information about silent payments proposal,
> implementation and tutorial on https://silentbitco.in
>
> I had no issues with performance of the UTXO Set and the blocks scan. I
> don't mind using flag but a new address/descriptor format should be a
> better approach. I could not review the code in detail or test edge cases
> however these suggestions by Pavol Rusnak make sense:
> https://gist.github.com/RubenSomsen/c43b79517e7cb701ebf77eec6dbb46b8?permalink_comment_id=4177027#gistcomment-4177027
>
>
> /dev/fd0
>
> Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com/>; secure email.
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Tuesday, May 24th, 2022 at 7:01 AM, woltx via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I created a short and simple tutorial on how to make silent payments on
> signet.
> https://gist.github.com/w0xlt/72390ded95dd797594f80baba5d2e6ee
>
> In this tutorial, the user will generate an address, publish it, receive
> and spend coins from it and still no transactions are shown from this
> address in a blockchain explorer.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220525/a6d14e05/attachment.html>;
Erik Aronesty [ARCHIVE] /
npub1y2ā¦5taj0
2023-06-07 23:09:59
in reply to nevent1qā¦6j8f
Author Public Key
npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0Published at
2023-06-07 23:09:59Event JSON
{
"id": "8bbb677d5305fb1bd2f2fd1ef3279487f5d14f5aab950662ececeedc224ae4fb",
"pubkey": "22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa",
"created_at": 1686179399,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ded76c8a55cb0bc46041fe38948c1da8b63ace4c787c0ec8276a40137c286ec0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"12dce0c00551b8939dac1f243fe1f55172a621424cacf26c7f1cc528f40f952e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"745e2723e72d7ded3f0dd293d710b706cd302ab8476983c292d4bdb7f9c5d366"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2022-05-25\nš Original message:i like the 00 || X_spend || X_scan + mandate address reuse prevention.\n\nmight as well start with something strict\n\neasy to loosen it later - if needed - harder to tighten it later because of\nback-compatibility with addresses in-use\n\n\nOn Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:02 AM alicexbt via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hi woltx,\n\u003e\n\u003e Thanks for implementing silent payments in Bitcoin Core. I tried the steps\n\u003e shared in tutorial and everything works as expected.\n\u003e\n\u003e I have updated the silent payment address (signet) as TXT record for\n\u003e domain alice.silentbitco.in\n\u003e\n\u003e $ dig -t txt alice.silentbitco.in +short\n\u003e \"tb1px3kma8e8y8z9l7e640v0x2chzrzww9cu06mqvwyrz805ffletu3s067sgh\"\n\u003e\n\u003e I have also added basic information about silent payments proposal,\n\u003e implementation and tutorial on https://silentbitco.in\n\u003e\n\u003e I had no issues with performance of the UTXO Set and the blocks scan. I\n\u003e don't mind using flag but a new address/descriptor format should be a\n\u003e better approach. I could not review the code in detail or test edge cases\n\u003e however these suggestions by Pavol Rusnak make sense:\n\u003e https://gist.github.com/RubenSomsen/c43b79517e7cb701ebf77eec6dbb46b8?permalink_comment_id=4177027#gistcomment-4177027\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e /dev/fd0\n\u003e\n\u003e Sent with ProtonMail \u003chttps://protonmail.com/\u003e secure email.\n\u003e\n\u003e ------- Original Message -------\n\u003e On Tuesday, May 24th, 2022 at 7:01 AM, woltx via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e I created a short and simple tutorial on how to make silent payments on\n\u003e signet.\n\u003e https://gist.github.com/w0xlt/72390ded95dd797594f80baba5d2e6ee\n\u003e\n\u003e In this tutorial, the user will generate an address, publish it, receive\n\u003e and spend coins from it and still no transactions are shown from this\n\u003e address in a blockchain explorer.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220525/a6d14e05/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "a8a7492da32c1ffdeef5c114c1ba67fd7d4a7a4fdb2048cfcc4745d496ef77855023f84032e1d18e2c66593bea0ae9cd06d8e8edc93a7c7a6f44935cd9328b1d"
}