📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15
📝 Original message:On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended
> use/direction.
...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?
More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from
the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter
than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-)
-roy
Roy Badami [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tr…0f95j
2023-06-07 15:11:42
in reply to nevent1q…uee2
Author Public Key
npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95jPublished at
2023-06-07 15:11:42Event JSON
{
"id": "8bcc48c654b9493abb0f2e39e75f7c6dc205cbd46ce6ada61c505e9a6ab65041",
"pubkey": "58f160e0dbc661605704b190e36f5199f881c861e53763c7057e6bc0c13e6950",
"created_at": 1686150702,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b79d8c7bec3dc6952db91cc68d0510d9897c37dcf58a24d8e2f4288fe42525c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7780b609507be8f91f4e3ae9b22dd3ec542dd20edb07c9c1418f780ecebfcd6c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e \"static address\" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended\n\u003e use/direction.\n\n...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?\n\nMore seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from\nthe phrase \"static address\". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter\nthan \"address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated\". :-)\n\n-roy",
"sig": "b6ba60f0a71c15097560738b66cc2e63af2da74bd0ec65800f635d66ac529a5de081e56cadd4d3407211bf409b38c00c507ba66d8fde9b1339d1dbeec69959ad"
}