Event JSON
{
"id": "8bd7f47520311df039ab89db022cf40f596d0de192514da858981efad54f5c71",
"pubkey": "9a64dd44256e6741e56390a24c93311b2f8fe69dd81379b18b58fb9fec304a83",
"created_at": 1710508403,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"54814b2fe4532ebababaf5bbffeb2f7707ce45a922b7bafa280121f24cdde453",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"2464a99bb3a2cface2d500032721fbdb4f036b4c92624d2039a11cc2d6a744a4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"07a475fec75967a4d46263be07f7ce2d3861c6283a35d1239b4c64939972255c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fosstodon.org/users/djspiewak/statuses/112099878724348111",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub12jq5ktly2vht4w467kall6e0wuruu3dfy2mm473gqyslynxau3fsakhq6m Not sure I agree actually, and we have a bit of evidence to chew on here. Scalaz used to have an IO which was pure but entirely blocking. It was essentially entirely ignored in practice in favor of Scala Future (impure but non-blocking) until Scalaz Task came around, when people started really leaning into the pure + async paradigm.",
"sig": "23d4835051fa69cf75ed84ee07d5f3376f2776fd24b3c9d1fd9f64f9b8b894a364816dcb2fa29dc11fe071575987fe8fa13cb9a26b375a596fbc29462b3343ba"
}
