Event JSON
{
"id": "84578c0797dbcd58505f8e401d7c1ce839271ce9eea226686da317deb1f32008",
"pubkey": "8e571f609e19e8301ad92829d8c745371f0cebe6e39c77815064d70fb2291cc9",
"created_at": 1727116491,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"scotus"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.sdf.org/@punklawyer/113188306381326447",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/punklawyer/statuses/113188306381326447",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/punklawyer/statuses/113188306381326447",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "#SCOTUS REVITALIZED PREGNANCY CRIME\n\nMarsh’s case is a “prime example of how pregnancy loss can become a criminal investigation very quickly,” said Dana Sussman. While similar cases predate the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, she said, they seem to be increasing.\n\n“The Dobbs decision unleashed and empowered prosecutors to look at pregnant people as a suspect class and at pregnancy loss as a suspicious event,” she said.\n\nhttps://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/pregnancy-loss-criminalization-homicide-south-carolina-college-student/",
"sig": "54b5e96d3c38f053e8177a86bc44960c62a7fc917195f2f9572bea973e34e84d29d033b6f754db143c4e6ff8760cf275b45024defd4841910c3e3543b12a3cc2"
}