Jorge Tim贸n [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 馃搮 Original date posted:2015-08-19 馃摑 Original message:On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at ...
馃搮 Original date posted:2015-08-19
馃摑 Original message:On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:44 AM, NxtChg via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Number of posts, August:
>
> 72, Jorge Tim贸n
Certainly I have talked to much this month, my apologies.
I believe most of my posts (if not all) were on-topic but I could
still had repeated myself much less.
I've been trying to concentrate my usual points in documents or
threads that I can link to so that my comments can be shorter.
But, yes, most of my posts have been related to general consensus
topics and not specific to Bitcoin Core development (that's part of
why I think the bitcoin-consensus and bitcoin-dev lists would be a
good separation).
In any case, my apologies for this unplanned record.
Published at
2023-06-07 17:37:06Event JSON
{
"id": "8485f9323450d2c1ca6e550424ac151a4b8ccfbcaee44937818d8aa589bde013",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159426,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5587f4ee7133a2208ecf01994db3230c769341f0a1c16d35bd2a8b755ea618f4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f93c4b20ac089f1b2eb6cbb9c03ed9367c644da607b7c3852a317c10655747f1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"238bb115101f2c05433c2b8aefc80ed5b4af9d3ff844748859d7a2298b116b49"
]
],
"content": "馃搮 Original date posted:2015-08-19\n馃摑 Original message:On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:44 AM, NxtChg via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Number of posts, August:\n\u003e\n\u003e 72, Jorge Tim贸n\n\nCertainly I have talked to much this month, my apologies.\nI believe most of my posts (if not all) were on-topic but I could\nstill had repeated myself much less.\nI've been trying to concentrate my usual points in documents or\nthreads that I can link to so that my comments can be shorter.\nBut, yes, most of my posts have been related to general consensus\ntopics and not specific to Bitcoin Core development (that's part of\nwhy I think the bitcoin-consensus and bitcoin-dev lists would be a\ngood separation).\nIn any case, my apologies for this unplanned record.",
"sig": "f515d1946f394f815fec7cd20f063032dc74bd961569f6087e4d40e4bb584e0a81b2289a96ecea1f0c72a9f9adaa5c5de01b9939af9240d51a76889e59cd4636"
}