Kenshiro [] [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2019-03-18 📝 Original message:Hi, I think Payjoin can be ...
📅 Original date posted:2019-03-18
📝 Original message:Hi,
I think Payjoin can be a very good privacy solution for Bitcoin, but I have a question about it:
- If a user has 1 BTC in a single address and make a payjoin payment to other person of 0.1 BTC using that address as input, the other person can see in a blockchain explorer the change address with an amount of 0.9 BTC. That's a serious privacy leak. I would like to know what will be the standard solution to this issue. An easy fix could be that the user wallet check if any address contains a BTC amount higher than a "safe" amount like 0.01 BTC or less. If some address exceed that amount the wallet could automatically make 1 payment to itself to split the amount in several addresses. In this way nobody receiving a payment from a user will ever know that he has a bitcoin balance higher than the "safe" amount.
What do you think?
Regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190318/e1d97bdb/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 18:17:08Event JSON
{
"id": "84b4daee6721ace6566aaf5d9eb58275065b853e278c55925420bd57ac7432db",
"pubkey": "0ce7e2b1ad324d13a3ee8a7b1c43f79ba8cda65d01dfbc5e5d30daeca7c3a598",
"created_at": 1686161828,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3a64fa1d6bf0e09a03baff40f1b71b246951bee11f0718bb5fdf8d57f64b4ddf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-03-18\n📝 Original message:Hi,\n\nI think Payjoin can be a very good privacy solution for Bitcoin, but I have a question about it:\n\n- If a user has 1 BTC in a single address and make a payjoin payment to other person of 0.1 BTC using that address as input, the other person can see in a blockchain explorer the change address with an amount of 0.9 BTC. That's a serious privacy leak. I would like to know what will be the standard solution to this issue. An easy fix could be that the user wallet check if any address contains a BTC amount higher than a \"safe\" amount like 0.01 BTC or less. If some address exceed that amount the wallet could automatically make 1 payment to itself to split the amount in several addresses. In this way nobody receiving a payment from a user will ever know that he has a bitcoin balance higher than the \"safe\" amount.\n\nWhat do you think?\n\nRegards,\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190318/e1d97bdb/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "4c98ac8206fd3784b1473bf5e51814083ae6f9069db04b5af67ad26a430d4abc147bade0284c0030f04fc4b3a0c1db19f6f9b16e60053101ea48a2f434565c88"
}