no they wouldn’t, even if it’s custodial it’s still a very elegant application of blind signatures for payments.
if it was somehow only proposed today you’d find they’d would just to try find a way to make it non-custodial probably
doot
npub13a…k8m54
2024-05-16 13:52:16
in reply to nevent1q…lum5
Author Public Key
npub13azv2cf3kd3xdzcwqxlgcudjg7r9nzak37usnn7h374lkpvd6rcq4k8m54Published at
2024-05-16 13:52:16Event JSON
{
"id": "8cc1b4bf44767a336929f7264b352a758f71819bad54b8a68e87d8eccfcbd07a",
"pubkey": "8f44c56131b362668b0e01be8c71b24786598bb68fb909cfd78fabfb058dd0f0",
"created_at": 1715867536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f916c0e790bf33ef2323124f326dfacdc28ee1bbd6a0e33f9fa0d74ef488a99c",
"wss://nos.lol/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7f3218682abf189cefb6cee39972eff959888a8c11b7e7120adc8f06d7d701a7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"43fabde62ffea1aa0ddae7c0ac03b7017e2d864f8665784b00bbfa2f9114c06a"
]
],
"content": "no they wouldn’t, even if it’s custodial it’s still a very elegant application of blind signatures for payments. \n\nif it was somehow only proposed today you’d find they’d would just to try find a way to make it non-custodial probably",
"sig": "d30a1e39d6bcdbb67274e49857b0bb02af013676a746d21ad8fa45c56db65c2c46666d5e77a901e3666bf8733fd5988b86d7935cdb0393967989672414a5f08a"
}