Just to complement my prior comment, Kevin Carson made a good point how these different theories of property could coexist in an anarchist society:
" Imagine an anarcho-capitalist community (Rothbardville) based on non-Proviso Lockean rules. An individual appeals to the community’s protection agency to enforce her property claim in a neighboring community which holds to the Ingalls-Tucker occupancy-and-use property rules, and collect rent from an occupant who refuses to recognize her title to the property. Given the enormous cost of enforcing such a claim in a community which regards it as repugnant, the anarcho-capitalist protection agency would likely have an exclusionary clause for such claims, or require the payment of an additional premium that would exceed the rental value of the property. In the mutualist community of Proudhonia, the mutual defense association would likely have a similar exclusionary clause for owner-occupants seeking protection from self-styled landlords in the anarcho-cap community. "
https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/04/in-defense-such-as-it-is-of-usufructory-land-ownership/
m4dire0701
npub1l0…k7zqa
2024-09-29 17:03:12
in reply to nevent1q…s0ng
Author Public Key
npub1l0j7srkgmdwy8839st2hn8f9utlgh9vtrm04jksh8tsu32h5vpms9k7zqaSeen on
wss://nostr.xmr.rocksPublished at
2024-09-29 17:03:12Event JSON
{
"id": "8cedd97cf631053889b45643000c44bc07268fc88d4f2376ca4fec102b36f9ea",
"pubkey": "fbe5e80ec8db5c439e2582d5799d25e2fe8b958b1edf595a173ae1c8aaf46077",
"created_at": 1727629392,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c08ba96b82cb0d41f5c70b866e23f8342e66821b472d43b7b9f50a0b5aabfeb8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"80b1c941324050f06aefabed5360f5b1ae27cbee34149245b27e593dcd808986"
],
[
"e",
"0c7fbe29f5e388a127989082d79506f8860c0e854c97a4fab70d0cf92dbb4584",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fbe5e80ec8db5c439e2582d5799d25e2fe8b958b1edf595a173ae1c8aaf46077"
],
[
"p",
"e3b5f43280264c6d1d2e4376e5c5de645ae66bc580fa454f01b711e7f5bee9d0"
],
[
"p",
"4984db1bff87bf67cb3ddfef84625dca922fb6fb2ec343d59fa026fc9c2985c9"
],
[
"p",
"47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e"
],
[
"r",
"https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/04/in-defense-such-as-it-is-of-usufructory-land-ownership/"
]
],
"content": "Just to complement my prior comment, Kevin Carson made a good point how these different theories of property could coexist in an anarchist society:\n\n\" Imagine an anarcho-capitalist community (Rothbardville) based on non-Proviso Lockean rules. An individual appeals to the community’s protection agency to enforce her property claim in a neighboring community which holds to the Ingalls-Tucker occupancy-and-use property rules, and collect rent from an occupant who refuses to recognize her title to the property. Given the enormous cost of enforcing such a claim in a community which regards it as repugnant, the anarcho-capitalist protection agency would likely have an exclusionary clause for such claims, or require the payment of an additional premium that would exceed the rental value of the property. In the mutualist community of Proudhonia, the mutual defense association would likely have a similar exclusionary clause for owner-occupants seeking protection from self-styled landlords in the anarcho-cap community. \"\n\nhttps://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/04/in-defense-such-as-it-is-of-usufructory-land-ownership/",
"sig": "50baefb0e6ae78ec8539da3d4d91416c2fec33c0c7354bbb74a98f5246676720002ec93798ba2d71584f83ae78e82408d6920e0e8af0ab03eee7f39da90c58e6"
}