I believe each protocol has its use case.
I don't recommend cashu for big amounts either, since it's custodial, and you never know. But what if you're the custodian?
For example, I onboard people with my own mint: I create and send nuts, bundled in a PWA. The other person receives sats in less than a minute with no prior bitcoin experience. I explain the trust model and that they can withdraw it thru LN whenever they want.
I probably could do something similar with fedi and mutiny? I am not sure, and I don't trust a federation yet. And it's not straightforward (or possible at all) to run my own like I do my mint.
ODT / ⚡ODT⚡
npub1uw…wkpsa
2024-05-25 20:27:51
in reply to nevent1q…gpmj
Author Public Key
npub1uw5r5zph90dmvckkus2leadcqhhhhjctywrezt9d4kwhtvftnfuquwkpsaPublished at
2024-05-25 20:27:51Event JSON
{
"id": "8c0f2a6b9f4b702815031cd71941adce9ff979e5df91d1bb3f5cee4814235cae",
"pubkey": "e3a83a08372bdbb662d6e415fcf5b805ef7bcb0b2387912cadad9d75b12b9a78",
"created_at": 1716668871,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"93efcd5837815328accce5f28bbc32dc04b9d5dc0ea88b9ef4f49b5d2ca3f21a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"5be6446aa8a31c11b3b453bf8dafc9b346ff328d1fa11a0fa02a1e6461f6a9b1"
]
],
"content": "I believe each protocol has its use case. \n\nI don't recommend cashu for big amounts either, since it's custodial, and you never know. But what if you're the custodian? \n\nFor example, I onboard people with my own mint: I create and send nuts, bundled in a PWA. The other person receives sats in less than a minute with no prior bitcoin experience. I explain the trust model and that they can withdraw it thru LN whenever they want. \nI probably could do something similar with fedi and mutiny? I am not sure, and I don't trust a federation yet. And it's not straightforward (or possible at all) to run my own like I do my mint. ",
"sig": "a3c70fed359a827b0c77fe8c4b6cd586eac78f4e0c6613c3922fea099d7d110594ae8cae835f24c3cf60607a7f1ea371625714116beda2b7f7e774052d581b98"
}