📅 Original date posted:2011-12-29
🗒️ Summary of this message: A user defends the use of random code in a script, despite concerns raised about its adequacy and potential risks.
📝 Original message:On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:01:20 PM roconnor at theorem.ca wrote:
> This is not adequate: <data> OP_SHA256 OP_EVAL runs random code that is
> more than 5 bytes.
So what? Why shouldn't I be able to run random code? I could always put that
random code in the script verbatim, after all.
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 02:53:31
in reply to nevent1q…azmy
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 02:53:31Event JSON
{
"id": "8e8c9516342a0d5d42f5740b32705d46d267b20ca307450f49df6712ee3592a6",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686106411,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9a940b93a02313cdd87199fd3d7a873bc06ba92e835205564dcc696f8e0046db",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b4c2bf6ea6b247c67ad555c5143335cf7dbba36b76a418a645f3698411e73de6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ec4a4dbf50f892d8061c301520612ae1f0d68350dff4e3e14707d47419d55206"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-12-29\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A user defends the use of random code in a script, despite concerns raised about its adequacy and potential risks.\n📝 Original message:On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:01:20 PM roconnor at theorem.ca wrote:\n\u003e This is not adequate: \u003cdata\u003e OP_SHA256 OP_EVAL runs random code that is\n\u003e more than 5 bytes.\n\nSo what? Why shouldn't I be able to run random code? I could always put that \nrandom code in the script verbatim, after all.",
"sig": "e5660a1388c8dafff1f55f3a6409376b7de3bc0791499b11fe42f16ae91387a7dd911844f59346b1567df88383aa6a876511d88e5a91956170b767eb9c0adb2c"
}