Tomas [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-05-05 📝 Original message:Sorry, I wasn't aware. ...
Published at
2023-06-07 18:00:50Event JSON
{
"id": "8ecfb9fe7ca9fef1270bc670ffc6584555f092a20dd7b5d95982dc23a666de25",
"pubkey": "1c03575343555d1132a621c49466190d680da4a306ba8b992e8b87e267609cdd",
"created_at": 1686160850,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"aaaeb91cb99bfec6570df98e02533573758fd52cf4f2c85211d2b21362e03d79",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"73ca3c535278412f69461ba91ef81ac0ba6b25f2c3a9a6786230f0a3af11c475",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"62ddcb547224b421822b62845fb1bbd77c838b924bd022814cfcbe25b7a07475"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-05-05\n📝 Original message:Sorry, I wasn't aware. This is indeed the same proposal.\n\n\n\nOn Fri, May 5, 2017, at 15:01, Bryan Bishop wrote:\n\u003e On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-\n\u003e dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\u003e\u003e I propose a method to mark blocks to indicate that they were\n\u003e\u003e generated\u003e\u003e without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using\n\u003e\u003e a bit of\u003e\u003e the version field.\n\u003e \n\u003e see also:\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html\u003e \n\u003e - Bryan\n\u003e http://heybryan.org/\n\u003e 1 512 203 0507\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170505/7da7d11e/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "dfe81710e54014d54c35ec064d04f54a3c2afcba9f9c7189d39dfd2d8fa2056f5aaa4649c8c86f7d0c1065a379120462130d3e2c02c51c9217f0306299897103"
}