Event JSON
{
"id": "8ea868c50319d4c6a911dc3ddd9f7abddd5c05f50bed1b9efe07e0246534babe",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1686312189,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d0713b73b39bb6176f850dc0c220b1e758d43762410f848c4cb7a0e194fc6a79",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b81aec0fc1bd6a95dfc56df7b42760004d3da570a949491723dce2b5dde5ab2c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"eb42c593536e0d3a4653ac5219d551b12f0738fe216f4b15224daa51d2c1a4b6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/110514155620780260"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub16pcnkuannwmpwmu9phqvyg93uavdgdmzgy8cfrzvk7swr98udfus6s8j5n Totally fair. But I wonder: Would they have even been joined in the first place if this litigation model weren't feasible? If plaintiffs couldn't just dismiss anyone who looked like they might fight back, this whole litigation model might be less attractive.",
"sig": "a7aebfb3410a085a07532c467d9dc32b4e5ac63a6629d0f70b685d3f2cfdb5a473b01568832a8f2ae7a061cc444643715a753c233451ee12ac410274b083740a"
}
