Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 18:10:57
in reply to

Tao Effect [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-02-19 📝 Original message:Real quick (I've received ...

📅 Original date posted:2018-02-19
📝 Original message:Real quick (I've received some off-list replies and do plan to respond to those), want to be clear: this thread is not meant to be interpreted as a proposal to modify Bitcoin (it is not a BIP), it is just, exactly as the subject says, some thoughts I had that I hadn't seen expressed elsewhere, that I felt like sharing, in case they are at all useful/interesting to anyone.

Cheers,
Greg

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

> On Feb 19, 2018, at 12:10 AM, Ryan J Martin <rjmarti2 at millersville.edu <mailto:rjmarti2 at millersville.edu>> wrote:
>
> To be frank, this kind of thing would be better off attempted as a fork to a new coin. Changing the max number of coins, the block reward, the difficulty algo, mining policy and protocol is going to be a non-starter. Also, what are the proposed quantifiavle benefits from removing timestamps? How would this be done at the protocol level? Are these other changes related to removing timestamps/rationale for other supply changes?
>
> Regards,
> Ryan J. Martin
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180219/e9eb9acd/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180219/e9eb9acd/attachment.sig>;
Author Public Key
npub1r0g954grld59fuphzsypmuuhpdunq67f729afmp44h2mxvth2hts4vdpg3