Current reading is Sidney Dekker's "The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error". It's really framing my read on someone raising concerns about culture and process based on a specific likely non-exploitable hypothetical security concern as a tell, and the response being about how that specific security concern isn't exploitable.
Very few pilots want to fly their airplanes into the ground. They thought they were making good decisions.
Dan Lyke /
npub18t…jnm77
2024-08-15 17:15:03
Author Public Key
npub18tvqvselr5yayepamzl5zc5fqfcyf9feswd2k7ua5g27r4tgrwkq2jnm77Published at
2024-08-15 17:15:03Event JSON
{
"id": "8d573cbd522bf67e4cc7f0e77788098a00e5cd22e910ac13d0667d8f68cdcab8",
"pubkey": "3ad806433f1d09d2643dd8bf4162890270449539839aab7b9da215e1d5681bac",
"created_at": 1723742103,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://researchbuzz.masto.host/users/danlyke/statuses/112967162466743464",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Current reading is Sidney Dekker's \"The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error\". It's really framing my read on someone raising concerns about culture and process based on a specific likely non-exploitable hypothetical security concern as a tell, and the response being about how that specific security concern isn't exploitable.\n\nVery few pilots want to fly their airplanes into the ground. They thought they were making good decisions.",
"sig": "74f749d5891937905b72cd809faa9b9c05501de598b01e1786285012f9a5c01ddc89e74b08f5199a91d14bc176449c8dca87855d361a12d03473e852e488df50"
}