📅 Original date posted:2019-07-22
📝 Original message:Has someone built an analysis of how much extra bandwidth CFB uses over
bloom filters?
Obviously an active merchant in an impoverished country paying data rates
per MB will never be able to afford CFB — so those people are being cut out
of Bitcoin entirely. I suppose the plan is they will rely on custodial
services now?
But if someone receives say, 5 tx a day, how much more bandwidth precisely
will CFB require over bloom?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 7/20/19 10:46 AM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > (less trustful and privacy-violating) alternative
> > over the coming years.
>
> The same paper that established the 'privacy-violating' conventional
> wisdom presented mitigations which have seen little exploration.
> https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/763.pdf
>
> Meanwhile we have custodial LN, the L-BTC altcoin and, today, a massive
> push into infrastructure for fully custodial accounts.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190722/95f794b2/attachment.html>;
Dustin Dettmer [ARCHIVE] /
npub1x5…kqsqu
2023-06-07 18:19:38
in reply to nevent1q…7tga
Author Public Key
npub1x54n25utwk7dzwzvk2v0aknptez5gxdwcyrxx2wgc0lnhgvwu72qmkqsquPublished at
2023-06-07 18:19:38Event JSON
{
"id": "8a6c3f76a2406fd214dbc609d58316e5ba7aaba2e8229b940fee0d2c2685012f",
"pubkey": "352b35538b75bcd1384cb298feda615e454419aec1066329c8c3ff3ba18ee794",
"created_at": 1686161978,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9984a06ec701a8f6ac2773e4a62741a4d9d15af90b1fce9ee03180b7fd819eec",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"25c92419f4c6872dc108be1aed7c4b7954d2393e4611c23d671ed7e05e1f2f1c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-07-22\n📝 Original message:Has someone built an analysis of how much extra bandwidth CFB uses over\nbloom filters?\n\nObviously an active merchant in an impoverished country paying data rates\nper MB will never be able to afford CFB — so those people are being cut out\nof Bitcoin entirely. I suppose the plan is they will rely on custodial\nservices now?\n\nBut if someone receives say, 5 tx a day, how much more bandwidth precisely\nwill CFB require over bloom?\n\nOn Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On 7/20/19 10:46 AM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e (less trustful and privacy-violating) alternative\n\u003e \u003e over the coming years.\n\u003e\n\u003e The same paper that established the 'privacy-violating' conventional\n\u003e wisdom presented mitigations which have seen little exploration.\n\u003e https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/763.pdf\n\u003e\n\u003e Meanwhile we have custodial LN, the L-BTC altcoin and, today, a massive\n\u003e push into infrastructure for fully custodial accounts.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190722/95f794b2/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "021df7f823e37f8f6aac19af5dfba7855cae72e21f072d2146e6ed8d3a3c9b3efa0837b1aa8c42eb00b5af35f00d7256c27dd419393e7377d17fb16190b604a4"
}