đź“… Original date posted:2015-07-28
đź“ť Original message:
I don’t really think there’s a lack of motivation.
The unfortunate situation is that soft forks are backlogged…and the entire soft fork process is undergoing some pretty significant changes. There were already some pretty major concerns about it. The version bits BIP (https://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550 <https://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550>;) which would allow multiple concurrent soft forks is still under works. Then the BIP66 fork brought to light some more problems with the process. And then on top of all that we have this block size hard fork circus…
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> Joseph Poon <joseph at lightning.network> writes:
>> OP_CSV still requires BIP 62, though. It's possible to construct a model
>> with OP_CLTV without BIP 62 (described in a post earlier today) using
>> single-funder with some OP_CLTV'd output which returns the full balance
>> to the original funder at a date very far in the future after the
>> expiration of all Commitments and its dependent outputs.
>
> Yeah, I'm happy at this stage assuming BIP62. There don't seem any
> objections to it, just not huge motivation.
>
> Nice to know we have a backup if that proves overly optimistic :)
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150727/53284608/attachment-0001.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150727/53284608/attachment-0001.sig>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-09 12:43:48
in reply to nevent1q…qdnd
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:48Event JSON
{
"id": "8a49bd31e1ac1d4ce8ae2a29578bc4c5ea6079dd1b72211abb3d8a75e17036ee",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686314628,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f62f6277769fcd537d6aeb276bfefef2d4f935db7fb2a9a222718eaccf9d379f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f30d392b7b80ddbf075f45f4875d8b3b93e0692921377723196d58361fcf2179",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-28\n📝 Original message:\nI don’t really think there’s a lack of motivation.\n\nThe unfortunate situation is that soft forks are backlogged…and the entire soft fork process is undergoing some pretty significant changes. There were already some pretty major concerns about it. The version bits BIP (https://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550 \u003chttps://gist.github.com/sipa/bf69659f43e763540550\u003e) which would allow multiple concurrent soft forks is still under works. Then the BIP66 fork brought to light some more problems with the process. And then on top of all that we have this block size hard fork circus…\n\n\u003e On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Joseph Poon \u003cjoseph at lightning.network\u003e writes:\n\u003e\u003e OP_CSV still requires BIP 62, though. It's possible to construct a model\n\u003e\u003e with OP_CLTV without BIP 62 (described in a post earlier today) using\n\u003e\u003e single-funder with some OP_CLTV'd output which returns the full balance\n\u003e\u003e to the original funder at a date very far in the future after the\n\u003e\u003e expiration of all Commitments and its dependent outputs.\n\u003e \n\u003e Yeah, I'm happy at this stage assuming BIP62. There don't seem any\n\u003e objections to it, just not huge motivation.\n\u003e \n\u003e Nice to know we have a backup if that proves overly optimistic :)\n\u003e \n\u003e Cheers,\n\u003e Rusty.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150727/53284608/attachment-0001.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150727/53284608/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "1b25cccc1065d0e409198713fe9861547f251ab0d54774dd1e8b05e952a8855ac31c84ac3a5ef1e670900a870f146cc5af534a61a87efeba86bfade676e8e663"
}