Stiven on Nostr: I think it is mainly a logical reaction to the blind push for wind/solar at all cost. ...
I think it is mainly a logical reaction to the blind push for wind/solar at all cost. They are simply not more ethical nor sustainable if you do the full value chain accounting. After 30 years of subsidy they are still a low % of the grid while being completely dependent on unethical labor camp mining of cobalt and many other precious metals. How is this a moral or environmental improvement. Hydrocarbons in many cases (most) is still more economically sound & less environmentally impactful. It’s just math and logic.
Plus, try melting steel & aluminum with wind turbines & solar panels.
BTW, I am a life-long hard core environmentalist.
Published at
2023-05-12 07:47:51Event JSON
{
"id": "8ac633b1cb707afff9917cab8410beead3e5d5036676df920312622d814fa27d",
"pubkey": "0e1f9dab9d8c483be496b0683a651779998d41d26fe772aa5048a3234321791c",
"created_at": 1683877671,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a9ceccb769659186b7dfb3ab0cce40c239d88b6e23a73ca098bbec872ec40c26"
],
[
"p",
"970996533690dbc419097103de4062594d92bd24d3ea15b3e2d66b4ac39d8672"
]
],
"content": "I think it is mainly a logical reaction to the blind push for wind/solar at all cost. They are simply not more ethical nor sustainable if you do the full value chain accounting. After 30 years of subsidy they are still a low % of the grid while being completely dependent on unethical labor camp mining of cobalt and many other precious metals. How is this a moral or environmental improvement. Hydrocarbons in many cases (most) is still more economically sound \u0026 less environmentally impactful. It’s just math and logic. \n\nPlus, try melting steel \u0026 aluminum with wind turbines \u0026 solar panels. \n\nBTW, I am a life-long hard core environmentalist.",
"sig": "b4e11c091bedc93df2db380572cebb29263f068c676393d009917d2974db86d5566ad3f2cf8ee9c61b234cc6e8deb4076c641c3d3b9f2bf78e25359784b6734b"
}