Event JSON
{
"id": "88f9a5e500d31731dee8f253805aa579118eda36e85059576bbc89ced5efe730",
"pubkey": "192a30fafb50378e89fb43ec1ee37333da6ff31e596f6d0eb62a2d6af0143934",
"created_at": 1693128826,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"a0b872c956d425d381188500de28291f696ceeff467239ab01c395065b8cb71a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"03fae48550ad960885282f0eb9b09f8151310cb8bc443ae550605bd28d3de5d6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"0b56392ff2bfc8c198b1e080c90ad7c64996cb98516e23651c95ecf4f8975908",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://hessen.social/users/WolfgangFeist/statuses/110960890769538522",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub15zu89j2k6sja8qgcs5qdu2pfra5kemhlgeern2cpcw2svkuvkudqu3s7lx \n\n1/2\n\nIf we are honest, it is somewhat different: It is not the majority of scientists at a time who decide on the validity of a scientific result, but the rigorous scientific method. Sometimes majority opinions have to be corrected later (e.g. Newton's corpuscular theory of light).\n\nBut yes, if an overwhelming majority of scientists competent in a field agree, the probability of a valid result is very high; in most cases higher than the %-majority**.\n\n** see next post 2/2",
"sig": "e2b2744b8f14643976e9c4c04bb9af93c4a14ada4fc28ffb006388eee73b360ef99e81f2f4e24cb850a065466acf74f7e69a99f09211ea564cadfc370e11e1c6"
}