📅 Original date posted:2012-04-02
📝 Original message:On Monday, April 02, 2012 4:55:03 PM Alan Reiner wrote:
> Any thoughts? (I have no doubts that there are :) )
IMO, the sign-request URI should be an extension on the existing bitcoin: URI
scheme; this way, sigNeeded can be omitted to imply "sign with a sending
address".
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 10:02:32
in reply to nevent1q…rld8
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsPublished at
2023-06-07 10:02:32Event JSON
{
"id": "855e01f82b57f59e6919e54e8545846e1d4d079e6c3226d46944215b03369ebb",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686132152,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5bb4d423408bf0b009521e7b4ef6cfba42eb5b63ea5422c4d57e282127cd740e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"62d75b0498bde891cca41e3b81f299fdd6958233e105620686cd152d1751a2fa",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"86f42bcb76a431c128b596c36714ae73a42cae48706a9e5513d716043447f5ec"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-04-02\n📝 Original message:On Monday, April 02, 2012 4:55:03 PM Alan Reiner wrote:\n\u003e Any thoughts? (I have no doubts that there are :) )\n\nIMO, the sign-request URI should be an extension on the existing bitcoin: URI \nscheme; this way, sigNeeded can be omitted to imply \"sign with a sending \naddress\".",
"sig": "bb5dadd71ff6c677259a6037371da5f671b8be89c6b396100662a4f1da6f0f79d07982f930e74e29741cf2bd3dca780e438ab872d0e20be326636eb47ad410ed"
}