Wladimir [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-04-24 📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-24
📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you are
> > Another option: Instead of statically building it'd be easy enough to
> build against the 4.6 Qt headers instead without even swapping the
> library. Qt is, after all, forward-compatible - between the 4.x
> versions. This will lose some GUI features but if compatibility is
> more important here that's a choice that can be made.

Are you sure this is Qt 4.6 at all? Not Qt 4.7?

I'd expect *much* more symbols if this was a Qt 4.8 versus 4.6
conflict. Qt 4.7 introduced a lot of new things (see all the
occurences of #if QT_VERSION >= 0x040700 - things like
setPlaceHolderText would be expected to pop up too), but 4.8 did not.

Can you check?

Wladimir