📅 Original date posted:2017-07-11
📝 Original message:On 7/11/2017 6:41 PM, Tao Effect wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
> Drivechain has several issues that you've acknowledged but have not,
> IMO, adequately (at all really) addressed [1].
I replied to your email at length, at [2]. You should read that email,
and then reply to it with your outstanding objections, if you still have
them (per the usual customs of a mailing list).
[2]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-June/014609.html
> Adopting DC would be an irreversible course of action,
This is false -- it is easily reversible with a second soft fork.
Also, I would say to everyone that, (in my opinion as the OP) this
conversation will go off-topic if it veers exclusively into 'drivechain
review'.
Paul
Paul Sztorc [ARCHIVE] /
npub10t…w9uu9
2023-06-07 18:04:17
in reply to nevent1q…la8x
Author Public Key
npub10tqt6wdc2neye0cxwyphtre6n5uccgur94khtqjdry9wxhrvywlq6w9uu9Published at
2023-06-07 18:04:17Event JSON
{
"id": "87a59ec79bf5121a4e0cf63dc01130fd15c6e1007bf844d29d1cbe6643cfb709",
"pubkey": "7ac0bd39b854f24cbf067103758f3a9d398c23832d6d75824d190ae35c6c23be",
"created_at": 1686161057,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0dbbb3b4fffe9287047e58a8fa04c4b6c95589f2269ea5553f7cb2691feb3b03",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d8ccbfec5ad72c569466210bcacdd544705bf9447a4245721426f1b12f1349be",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1bd05a5503fb6854f03714081df3970b79306bc9f28bd4ec35add5b3317755d7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-07-11\n📝 Original message:On 7/11/2017 6:41 PM, Tao Effect wrote:\n\u003e Dear Paul,\n\u003e\n\u003e Drivechain has several issues that you've acknowledged but have not,\n\u003e IMO, adequately (at all really) addressed [1].\n\nI replied to your email at length, at [2]. You should read that email,\nand then reply to it with your outstanding objections, if you still have\nthem (per the usual customs of a mailing list).\n\n[2]\nhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-June/014609.html\n\n\u003e Adopting DC would be an irreversible course of action,\n\nThis is false -- it is easily reversible with a second soft fork.\n\nAlso, I would say to everyone that, (in my opinion as the OP) this\nconversation will go off-topic if it veers exclusively into 'drivechain\nreview'.\n\nPaul",
"sig": "538544bb2c7c0ddafd8fcab369170cb998e7659d2441c01fab0f9fdeda8541e83a4f8fcdda053d5724a0d57c8b0b2f2fa610ba3d75f98bbfeef97fed32dd5c3c"
}