đ
Original date posted:2019-07-23
đ Original message:
> > How would bruteforcing on the CSV delay be different from a BIP32
> > wallet with look ahead keys? Especially given that we could try with
> > most probable values first.
>
> It's a big multiplier, given that CSV can be specified by the
> counterparty. If you accept up to 1024 and offer 144, that's 880
> variants to look for, per key.
We could restrict CSV delays to be e.g. multiple of 144 between 144
and 2016, that would only be 14 variants.
> It also can't be done with a normal bitcoin wallet, which is unfortunate
> too.
Right, but it wouldn't work for local commitments.
I feel like alignment of incentives should prevail here. Funds are
still recoverable with just the seed, which is a huge improvement vs
what is currently the case.
Pierre [ARCHIVE] /
npub1yzâŚy4pdt
2023-06-09 12:55:37
in reply to nevent1qâŚz5wa
Author Public Key
npub1yz88535e0ydqye9q9x8l5cz9d3g6ervfjgyk5xm88zvktmxvstlsuy4pdtPublished at
2023-06-09 12:55:37Event JSON
{
"id": "911d0bb9ea1bfafb68fa587726bc12a7de2ed41b9cfd5771d5de40468c89d069",
"pubkey": "208e7a4699791a0264a0298ffa60456c51ac8d8992096a1b67389965eccc82ff",
"created_at": 1686315337,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4ed5097f84a96d355dd0c09671071ce607be05110e934ca0ea1fefe7258fc79c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"adc1fdbb29f8d31e02f85d1d37e7a8ff29a357ed44bd8df4c6fbaf6d55e13c83",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2019-07-23\nđ Original message:\n\u003e \u003e How would bruteforcing on the CSV delay be different from a BIP32\n\u003e \u003e wallet with look ahead keys? Especially given that we could try with\n\u003e \u003e most probable values first.\n\u003e\n\u003e It's a big multiplier, given that CSV can be specified by the\n\u003e counterparty. If you accept up to 1024 and offer 144, that's 880\n\u003e variants to look for, per key.\n\nWe could restrict CSV delays to be e.g. multiple of 144 between 144\nand 2016, that would only be 14 variants.\n\n\u003e It also can't be done with a normal bitcoin wallet, which is unfortunate\n\u003e too.\n\nRight, but it wouldn't work for local commitments.\n\nI feel like alignment of incentives should prevail here. Funds are\nstill recoverable with just the seed, which is a huge improvement vs\nwhat is currently the case.",
"sig": "a9f9cf60a17bde78509a3b542a0183a64adcf6f28cb19754246553df0a1ad2fac59b84a03d181b76d4bfff47a10606120e69387ca0b3a3ad7174485366474eec"
}