Yes. And the main point would be that one npub has to commit for a locality. Moving could be possible, but would have opportunity costs attached: you loose access to the old locality. And moving too often could be considered spammy.
This could be a metric for a public reach equilibrium. An elastic system.
Certainly always overridable by the clients (e.g. by fellowship).
schmijos / Josua Schmid
npub1ax…h6ukq
2024-08-07 20:22:13
in reply to nevent1q…fp86
Author Public Key
npub1axy65mspxl2j5sgweky6uk0h4klmp00vj7rtjxquxure2j6vlf5smh6ukqPublished at
2024-08-07 20:22:13Event JSON
{
"id": "92206a38cd2f103055d9f47de49933475ee7804b0835f958e950c88af80b5f05",
"pubkey": "e989aa6e0137d52a410ecd89ae59f7adbfb0bdec9786b9181c3707954b4cfa69",
"created_at": 1723062133,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"097b386bd73694b7367497f05178ba7fae4bb321a96d7497066cac55082ae3c3",
"wss://nostr.wine/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"84d87c3f36ff1b4b240c76d2c80bf5ac1c022fd2b7be81393d9155eb33f94bad",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d"
]
],
"content": "Yes. And the main point would be that one npub has to commit for a locality. Moving could be possible, but would have opportunity costs attached: you loose access to the old locality. And moving too often could be considered spammy.\n\nThis could be a metric for a public reach equilibrium. An elastic system.\n\nCertainly always overridable by the clients (e.g. by fellowship).",
"sig": "e385b519ebd89e8bd50a444ae3515161a72bb34c07082364cd04d2f2451d0f33c6431172b5457205c9ce0588cc003f5873c9592e83f0cb7bc1f68de2fe1e5620"
}