đ
Original date posted:2017-11-03
đ Original message:Oops. That makes much more sense than what I said. Thanks a lot for the
clarification.
On 03.11.2017 02:10, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Jets are briefly discussed in section 3.4 of
> https://blockstream.com/simplicity.pdf
>
> The idea is that we can recognize some set of popular Simplicity
> expressions, and when the Simplicity interpreter encounters one of these
> expressions it can skip over the Simplicity interpreter and instead
> directly evaluate the function using specialized C or assembly code.
>
> For example, when the Simplicity interpreter encounters the Simplicity
> expression for ECDSA verification, it might directly call into libsecp
> rather than continuing the ECDSA verification using interpreted Simplicity.
>
> HTH.
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2017 18:35, "JOSE FEMENIAS CAĂUELO via bitcoin-dev"
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to follow this Simplicity proposal and I am seeing all
> over references to âjetsâ, but I havenât been able to find any good
> reference to it.
> Can anyone give me a brief explanation and or a link pointing to
> this feature?
> Thanks
>
>> On 31 Oct 2017, at 22:01,
>> bitcoin-dev-request at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> The plan is that discounted jets will be explicitly labeled as
>> jets in the
>> commitment. If you can provide a Merkle path from the root to a
>> node that
>> is an explicit jet, but that jet isn't among the finite number of
>> known
>> discounted jets,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>;
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--
AdĂĄn SĂĄnchez de Pedro Crespo
CTO, Stampery Inc.
San Francisco - Madrid
AdĂĄn SĂĄnchez de Pedro Crespo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1gtâŚkhzxn
2023-06-07 18:07:29
in reply to nevent1qâŚcpcw
Author Public Key
npub1gtysrlxd5svywueh4767hrj3wfnx2gcx2wdtnnkhr9k57drhh52q3khzxnPublished at
2023-06-07 18:07:29Event JSON
{
"id": "9728a4728013423a41a3b49835d54df898609ab38d8bf8b45c2a840bd45552e2",
"pubkey": "42c901fccda418477337afb5eb8e517266652306539ab9ced7196d4f3477bd14",
"created_at": 1686161249,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f66293ea7a9b32888732d42282e8e2d2c8c37fd29a8c31abaf65ab4ee416ee28",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"eb4957db99d46c49bdff4163bd6032dfc62e01e4b1746668338b6008a3dba374",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2017-11-03\nđ Original message:Oops. That makes much more sense than what I said. Thanks a lot for the\nclarification.\n\nOn 03.11.2017 02:10, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Hi Jose,\n\u003e \n\u003e Jets are briefly discussed in section 3.4 of\n\u003e https://blockstream.com/simplicity.pdf\n\u003e \n\u003e The idea is that we can recognize some set of popular Simplicity\n\u003e expressions, and when the Simplicity interpreter encounters one of these\n\u003e expressions it can skip over the Simplicity interpreter and instead\n\u003e directly evaluate the function using specialized C or assembly code.\n\u003e \n\u003e For example, when the Simplicity interpreter encounters the Simplicity\n\u003e expression for ECDSA verification, it might directly call into libsecp\n\u003e rather than continuing the ECDSA verification using interpreted Simplicity.\n\u003e \n\u003e HTH.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e On Nov 2, 2017 18:35, \"JOSE FEMENIAS CAĂUELO via bitcoin-dev\"\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Hi,\n\u003e \n\u003e I am trying to follow this Simplicity proposal and I am seeing all\n\u003e over references to âjetsâ, but I havenât been able to find any good\n\u003e reference to it.\n\u003e Can anyone give me a brief explanation and or a link pointing to\n\u003e this feature?\n\u003e Thanks\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e On 31 Oct 2017, at 22:01,\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev-request at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev-request at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e The plan is that discounted jets will be explicitly labeled as\n\u003e\u003e jets in the\n\u003e\u003e commitment. If you can provide a Merkle path from the root to a\n\u003e\u003e node that\n\u003e\u003e is an explicit jet, but that jet isn't among the finite number of\n\u003e\u003e known\n\u003e\u003e discounted jets,\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003chttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\u003e\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \n\n-- \nAdĂĄn SĂĄnchez de Pedro Crespo\nCTO, Stampery Inc.\nSan Francisco - Madrid",
"sig": "2a19e1c734f1dca7f8c21cb8722a577b115c86bafbd305268704bea24dd20913a1f07ee556d6e035c656a93c964cd8a057c906a814fdb85fb7e0493f59625662"
}