Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2019-04-03 📝 Original message:Hi ZmnSCPxj, Thought ...
📅 Original date posted:2019-04-03
📝 Original message:Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Thought provoking, thank you!
Something I dislike in the scheme, that one could not tell which party colluded with the escrow agent.
Tamas Blummer
> On Apr 4, 2019, at 03:55, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html>
> Smart contracts have traditionally been implemented as part of the consensus rules of some blokchain. Often this means creating a new blockchain, or at least a sidechain to an existing blockchain. This writeup proposes an alternative method without launching a separate blockchain or sidechain, while achieving security similar to federated sidechains and additional benefits to privacy and smart-contract-patching.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-devPublished at
2023-06-07 18:17:33Event JSON
{
"id": "963c0db8d1a965bcae98e17aa9c7580e6e26530f876352a1c40d3b9b205dc3a1",
"pubkey": "c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7",
"created_at": 1686161853,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"78bdc6743a466b79edd05ba41690eaee43f610226f78863dfdd4695a8196fee9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"87d8925a5f092c282c4c2df02edf92b2c630fb7e25ce16958894db384ba79df0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-04-03\n📝 Original message:Hi ZmnSCPxj,\n\nThought provoking, thank you!\n\nSomething I dislike in the scheme, that one could not tell which party colluded with the escrow agent.\n\nTamas Blummer\n\n\u003e On Apr 4, 2019, at 03:55, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html\n\u003e \n\u003e Smart contracts have traditionally been implemented as part of the consensus rules of some blokchain. Often this means creating a new blockchain, or at least a sidechain to an existing blockchain. This writeup proposes an alternative method without launching a separate blockchain or sidechain, while achieving security similar to federated sidechains and additional benefits to privacy and smart-contract-patching.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "cf1fc4ab22a0b5edccd66ec7b3d849b52631e99db71e4090b5323466bd217c3609a7f2026f8afaadf4d64ec180b1ea90497fe6eb1c28fed9e63ec02e7cb7d793"
}