I'm less concerned about what make something go viral but what behavior going viral rewards. What got me thinking about this was the types of content posted to social media, particularly commentary and political content, and what the inherent rewards of the system encourage from creators.
From what I've seen, more extreme views get more engagement. No one cares about "Thing X is bad" but "Thing X is the worst thing ever and kills babies" tends to drive more clicks, likes, etc. which might push the "algorithm" to boost the post. In the end all the storm and fury surrounding one post that gets a zillion views doesn't mean much other than bragging rights. If, on the other hand, the reward is money there is more incentive to use that extremism to try and hit big, rake in the sats, and to keep going extreme to keep the sats flowing.
Maybe I'm overthinking it. (It's been known to happen.) I'm just wondering if one of the things that makes nostr awesome (the ability to reward value with value by zapping sats) doesn't also encourage the toxic behavior that is so prevalent on X, Facebook, etc.
PerlStalker
npub17p…glv2q
2024-09-12 03:23:43
in reply to nevent1q…6sn0
Author Public Key
npub17pns3th6s0ma23r686y4a3ku9eu03k5ntlgxh7vnj84pf88r587stglv2qPublished at
2024-09-12 03:23:43Event JSON
{
"id": "9e20ccc31736ec43a5c837a671cdc001c7cbe0f9468862477492c03270a3afb4",
"pubkey": "f06708aefa83f7d5447a3e895ec6dc2e78f8da935fd06bf99391ea149ce3a1fd",
"created_at": 1726111423,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4360fa717bbb5b4f50e8acf2686ae032da850884ef952d4106c1716e3273bc2f",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f424ff70b2045e187e86fb5ccda63999019c264a5083dc5f0c4c06850d644541",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f06708aefa83f7d5447a3e895ec6dc2e78f8da935fd06bf99391ea149ce3a1fd"
],
[
"p",
"d8bce3ef7ea85456a8d3ab0e36848a246575d738ef0eec0b7e04181d08db9cbd"
]
],
"content": "I'm less concerned about what make something go viral but what behavior going viral rewards. What got me thinking about this was the types of content posted to social media, particularly commentary and political content, and what the inherent rewards of the system encourage from creators.\n\nFrom what I've seen, more extreme views get more engagement. No one cares about \"Thing X is bad\" but \"Thing X is the worst thing ever and kills babies\" tends to drive more clicks, likes, etc. which might push the \"algorithm\" to boost the post. In the end all the storm and fury surrounding one post that gets a zillion views doesn't mean much other than bragging rights. If, on the other hand, the reward is money there is more incentive to use that extremism to try and hit big, rake in the sats, and to keep going extreme to keep the sats flowing.\n\nMaybe I'm overthinking it. (It's been known to happen.) I'm just wondering if one of the things that makes nostr awesome (the ability to reward value with value by zapping sats) doesn't also encourage the toxic behavior that is so prevalent on X, Facebook, etc.",
"sig": "57fd9ea990645187034f559488d1890417d1293cc11ef1a190ba5bb9ee8125f60f369654ff502d6a30decab6ca2c18f6e4d5b8950b15fd316514c9ceb589fced"
}