📅 Original date posted:2015-09-20
📝 Original message:Threat models can be developed for things like threats from governments.
The idea in developing a model is to put in the context of other
possible threats. For example, someone with a few million to burn can
easily crash the exchange rate or buy a couple core developers much
easier and cheaper than doing a 51% attack. These attacks can be done
by governments and non-governments alike. The people who consider
threats from government and think everyone associated with Bitcoin is
somehow "pure" are irrational cultists who have no business discussing
threat models in the first place.
Russ
On 9/20/2015 5:10 PM, NxtChg via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>> Anyone who doesn't consider governments the proper threat model is either a shill or an idiot.
>
> You meant to say "threat". This is what threat model is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threat_model
>
> Nobody here discounts governments as a threat.
>
> As to the "proper threat model", you can't construct one since your attacker is essentially unbounded.
>
> For example, any large government could easily obtain 51% of hash power and then only accept transactions from "certified services".
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
Milly Bitcoin [ARCHIVE] /
npub1rv…hc5wt
2023-06-07 17:40:38
in reply to nevent1q…pkhj
Author Public Key
npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wtPublished at
2023-06-07 17:40:38Event JSON
{
"id": "9e67d02fefa6ce2d80ee9f92bca9c1c2e89a9ddd7ee519a183d32220c6b8cbc1",
"pubkey": "1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50",
"created_at": 1686159638,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4dc88d58511033587919733d4dc9dc5f297805e31bd935cb9f1c91f45ed8346b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9e94665b4ba1427dea1e0c04989c651f2014bebf59bcd15709e8956a5b668798",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-20\n📝 Original message:Threat models can be developed for things like threats from governments. \n The idea in developing a model is to put in the context of other \npossible threats. For example, someone with a few million to burn can \neasily crash the exchange rate or buy a couple core developers much \neasier and cheaper than doing a 51% attack. These attacks can be done \nby governments and non-governments alike. The people who consider \nthreats from government and think everyone associated with Bitcoin is \nsomehow \"pure\" are irrational cultists who have no business discussing \nthreat models in the first place.\n\nRuss\n\n\n\nOn 9/20/2015 5:10 PM, NxtChg via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Anyone who doesn't consider governments the proper threat model is either a shill or an idiot.\n\u003e\n\u003e You meant to say \"threat\". This is what threat model is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threat_model\n\u003e\n\u003e Nobody here discounts governments as a threat.\n\u003e\n\u003e As to the \"proper threat model\", you can't construct one since your attacker is essentially unbounded.\n\u003e\n\u003e For example, any large government could easily obtain 51% of hash power and then only accept transactions from \"certified services\".\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e",
"sig": "f418554194960b81271323c11fac2a76ed792c4d92e0c59c7048e9edf198f07b6e9006499bd46cd9ae96453d2177d9f1e07e3d1486dad69830a6e62ba76a78b3"
}