Jimmy on Nostr: 1. I feel bad for the poor saps who end up wasting their money on a book written by a ...
1. I feel bad for the poor saps who end up wasting their money on a book written by a conspiracy theorist, charlatan, and nutter.
2. I'll grant you this, you got balls. You presume to lecture others over the scientific method, yet? If anyone doesn't know how to use it, it's you. I see nothing in your rambling is about peer-reviewed research, no links to scientific papers, you're not published in any journal as far as I know or you would have cited it already. Real science is about making testable predictions, and having peers replicate your test and see if the conclusions match, forming a hypothesis, asking more questions, and then repeating the process until there can be only one possible explanation. This is a goal that can never actually be reached, but if you do it enough, you attain the status of theories like E=mc², F=ma, Evolution, etc. none of these use or rely on the Bible because it would be so faulty. Stories like the biblical flood are contradicted by mountains of evidence at every level from physics, to chemistry to biology. If you had actual evidence to the contrary, it would be so earth-shattering you would be the most famous person in history, but we both know that's not going to happen.
Yes, a real scientist will explore the theories of his peers, but you are not a peer of any real scientist. A rocket scientist may think a child's cardboard space shuttle they made is adorable but they're not going to waste time perfecting the heat shield tiles for re-entry when it's never making it off the living room floor. Ever heard the phrase "you have to crawl before you can walk"? You haven't done any of the prerequisite work. Perhaps instead of worrying about me checking out YOUR presentation or running down YOUR sources, perhaps you should do a little more research about what other scientists say about this; or do you always disagree with the consensus just because it's the consensus?
The "what if it's true perspective"? No one goes through life operating that way, not even you. I don't assume the laws of gravity stopped working just because "what if it's true". No one would have time to do anything else. If I wasted time entertaining alternative versions of F=ma I'd probably get hit by a bus. We operate mostly on probabilities.
3. You never presented any evidence for your ridiculous claim.
4. Yeah the headline there is a bit misleading. Perhaps in a few billion years it'll come to a stop. Although in roughly 5 billion years the sun will expand to a red giant and possibly engulf the earth so...🤷♂️
5. Why would you assume the stated reason isn't true? Yes eventually there probably will be oceanfront property in Arizona, but that would be due to anthropomorphic climate change more than anything else.
What does being a bitcoiner on nostr have to do with any of this?
I got news for you dude, all these receipts you're stacking, they're all written in your own handwriting. You're in the same category as people who think the Earth is flat, aliens made the pyramids, or that there's a secret reptile base inside the Moon. It would be funny if it weren't so sad because someone's going to fall for your nonsense. Because of that I DON'T thank you for the conversation.
Published at
2025-05-19 22:55:12Event JSON
{
"id": "95b9730a8da8b813d80293212dd9b6ee3fa4641211d1188c53de46071d423d8b",
"pubkey": "015f514b98ad428a17943c74263731cdc1895051c895442ef9cd56547f0a09d5",
"created_at": 1747695312,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"774ffcb4f8f607562ab65c4920e08b1c3f2ed10e771fbda3f1a5744a76dfe256",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"261cee4f5973552e35ca43b4ef0e414f6f36a6a6ddc7447032635c9ea913b1fe"
],
[
"e",
"81d126417bb12e90f1cc639367f78de650829d9c9af4dd2a7e6de43f5b76b59a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1549ed4be71d1a70ea2dca4596cd0c54c61aea485c6e4e5a8ca463758c98dd4a"
]
],
"content": "1. I feel bad for the poor saps who end up wasting their money on a book written by a conspiracy theorist, charlatan, and nutter.\n\n2. I'll grant you this, you got balls. You presume to lecture others over the scientific method, yet? If anyone doesn't know how to use it, it's you. I see nothing in your rambling is about peer-reviewed research, no links to scientific papers, you're not published in any journal as far as I know or you would have cited it already. Real science is about making testable predictions, and having peers replicate your test and see if the conclusions match, forming a hypothesis, asking more questions, and then repeating the process until there can be only one possible explanation. This is a goal that can never actually be reached, but if you do it enough, you attain the status of theories like E=mc², F=ma, Evolution, etc. none of these use or rely on the Bible because it would be so faulty. Stories like the biblical flood are contradicted by mountains of evidence at every level from physics, to chemistry to biology. If you had actual evidence to the contrary, it would be so earth-shattering you would be the most famous person in history, but we both know that's not going to happen.\n\nYes, a real scientist will explore the theories of his peers, but you are not a peer of any real scientist. A rocket scientist may think a child's cardboard space shuttle they made is adorable but they're not going to waste time perfecting the heat shield tiles for re-entry when it's never making it off the living room floor. Ever heard the phrase \"you have to crawl before you can walk\"? You haven't done any of the prerequisite work. Perhaps instead of worrying about me checking out YOUR presentation or running down YOUR sources, perhaps you should do a little more research about what other scientists say about this; or do you always disagree with the consensus just because it's the consensus? \n\nThe \"what if it's true perspective\"? No one goes through life operating that way, not even you. I don't assume the laws of gravity stopped working just because \"what if it's true\". No one would have time to do anything else. If I wasted time entertaining alternative versions of F=ma I'd probably get hit by a bus. We operate mostly on probabilities.\n\n3. You never presented any evidence for your ridiculous claim.\n\n4. Yeah the headline there is a bit misleading. Perhaps in a few billion years it'll come to a stop. Although in roughly 5 billion years the sun will expand to a red giant and possibly engulf the earth so...🤷♂️\n\n5. Why would you assume the stated reason isn't true? Yes eventually there probably will be oceanfront property in Arizona, but that would be due to anthropomorphic climate change more than anything else.\n\nWhat does being a bitcoiner on nostr have to do with any of this?\n\nI got news for you dude, all these receipts you're stacking, they're all written in your own handwriting. You're in the same category as people who think the Earth is flat, aliens made the pyramids, or that there's a secret reptile base inside the Moon. It would be funny if it weren't so sad because someone's going to fall for your nonsense. Because of that I DON'T thank you for the conversation.",
"sig": "afc79cb03c7a83234eac072d192a41f10dc3e5a2147f36d4e292d010900d8b73dbc642b1c940f14b45786cadea36ee8033714b349ff1727c67cf095af9cd99fb"
}