More press criticism:
What was the most important political news yesterday? It used to be that you would look at the front page of the New York Times, and find out. Not what would get the most readers or be the most popular, but the most “newsworthy.” The professional quality most valued by the top editors was a judgment built from years of experience and breadth of knowledge, called “news judgment.”
You can’t find that there anymore. Priorities have changed. (1/3)
James Gleick /
npub1gs…twxft
2024-09-08 14:23:26
Author Public Key
npub1gsqxlu3pj34alvqauqpvwflw7q7xgm3mmzyjp8vdz3u9vxde425qttwxftPublished at
2024-09-08 14:23:26Event JSON
{
"id": "9849d699fbaf9986f42688488ae7bd7173d9b6c32f4c5804d6ccc8de3f47d002",
"pubkey": "44006ff221946bdfb01de002c727eef03c646e3bd889209d8d14785619b9aaa8",
"created_at": 1725805406,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mas.to/users/gleick/statuses/113102383121942368",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "More press criticism:\n\nWhat was the most important political news yesterday? It used to be that you would look at the front page of the New York Times, and find out. Not what would get the most readers or be the most popular, but the most “newsworthy.” The professional quality most valued by the top editors was a judgment built from years of experience and breadth of knowledge, called “news judgment.”\n\nYou can’t find that there anymore. Priorities have changed. (1/3)",
"sig": "d84a8703327f859c3c43d6399e7eee808593cea51a397e091fffe264e6f3b5d7d224a175fa55c2de44f23717dc89d17b213c2f0f1bbfef5077c7e7483098a8e7"
}