📅 Original date posted:2016-01-26
📝 Original message:On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:07:40 AM Toby Padilla wrote:
> > I don't see any benefit to changing that. It is better that coins are
> > burned.
>
> I think this is our fundamental disagreement. People will burn coins to
> encode data, why allow this when there's a better alternative?
My point is that there isn't a better alternative. The coins being burned, is
strictly better than it being gratis.
> > You *always* need a key, to redeem inputs... regardless of values.
>
> Correct, but with BIP70 that key is in the user's wallet and you can
> construct transactions on another machine (thus not needing a key during
> construction). Right now there's no way to do the transaction construction
> on another machine with zero value OP_RETURNs.
This is also a good thing. Spam should not be made easier or cheaper.
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 17:48:09
in reply to nevent1q…gz5n
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:09Event JSON
{
"id": "99ec0314a9958f5b5c5c90687d0f7f001b602d235f8e98349c2c25c4da251db3",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686160089,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"368032d333e01794ac3e7b97c278de084cce6e6228857d943836fb1a934a5739",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a0cda5ad5a7a514ea0510ed77c2afb189c88cb77848d009a2d56327ebbed68d1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d94a4049e1eafdb70a0dc089351c47ae335f75b3408012d8495d51889ad9a292"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-01-26\n📝 Original message:On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:07:40 AM Toby Padilla wrote:\n\u003e \u003e I don't see any benefit to changing that. It is better that coins are\n\u003e \u003e burned.\n\u003e \n\u003e I think this is our fundamental disagreement. People will burn coins to\n\u003e encode data, why allow this when there's a better alternative?\n\nMy point is that there isn't a better alternative. The coins being burned, is \nstrictly better than it being gratis.\n\n\u003e \u003e You *always* need a key, to redeem inputs... regardless of values.\n\u003e \n\u003e Correct, but with BIP70 that key is in the user's wallet and you can\n\u003e construct transactions on another machine (thus not needing a key during\n\u003e construction). Right now there's no way to do the transaction construction\n\u003e on another machine with zero value OP_RETURNs.\n\nThis is also a good thing. Spam should not be made easier or cheaper.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "93c4096012deab2268704a068722fb9faa7154da7eec61316d74f1eba4630ec7e1bd2ba00defa3ebcf13ca5ac90bc738712539ab59862d52ba64a55729bfeaf6"
}