i'm gonna tell you my path through Nostr. It may be useful for you or not. In the beginning, I noticed Nostr suffered an identity problem but then realized I didn't need identities to search interesting things on Nostr if I focused on logical reasoning and A priori knowledge, because you don't evaluate the attributes of the sender when you are trying to determine if a statement is logic and makes seen.
The problem of this approach is that I wasn't able to find a lot of people in the beginning of my Nostr journey, only the bitcoin maximalists I knew from Twitter, telegram and youtube. But then I found the idea of the "network"(follows of your follows) of primal and began researching about clients that could give me an algorithm that shows posts of "new people" from the "network".
I didn't find shit because I don't have technical experience but I found that muting my own follows on coracle would provide me posts of new people from the "network" and I could evaluate if that post were logical or not and weed out the spammers.
In that way, I was able to expand my base of follows and my "network" and I can find new logical people every now and then.
My conclusion is that no one thinks the same. Every person has different types of reasoning in their brains. I think the Best way to handle this is letting people be their own algorithms and not worrying to much about identity
Oftening /
npub1uf…muwjc
2023-10-01 19:05:32
in reply to nevent1q…wuk6
Author Public Key
npub1ufc84s97u7asgxj8mvka0c6du807c30s9ygzlle2pl3gut6wczxqrmuwjcPublished at
2023-10-01 19:05:32Event JSON
{
"id": "9fb4d036532d77904a962e1da192d2a879f777e9084b845d34987966995d34e8",
"pubkey": "e2707ac0bee7bb041a47db2dd7e34de1dfec45f029102fff2a0fe28e2f4ec08c",
"created_at": 1696187132,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb"
],
[
"e",
"fe0e3d4891696507bc5a1d481bbca2e9045fe1c552ef87164c8fcc17b81284e2",
"",
"root"
]
],
"content": "i'm gonna tell you my path through Nostr. It may be useful for you or not. In the beginning, I noticed Nostr suffered an identity problem but then realized I didn't need identities to search interesting things on Nostr if I focused on logical reasoning and A priori knowledge, because you don't evaluate the attributes of the sender when you are trying to determine if a statement is logic and makes seen.\n\nThe problem of this approach is that I wasn't able to find a lot of people in the beginning of my Nostr journey, only the bitcoin maximalists I knew from Twitter, telegram and youtube. But then I found the idea of the \"network\"(follows of your follows) of primal and began researching about clients that could give me an algorithm that shows posts of \"new people\" from the \"network\".\n\nI didn't find shit because I don't have technical experience but I found that muting my own follows on coracle would provide me posts of new people from the \"network\" and I could evaluate if that post were logical or not and weed out the spammers.\n\nIn that way, I was able to expand my base of follows and my \"network\" and I can find new logical people every now and then.\n\nMy conclusion is that no one thinks the same. Every person has different types of reasoning in their brains. I think the Best way to handle this is letting people be their own algorithms and not worrying to much about identity ",
"sig": "f5f00f3a63b42379b36bd1c4a15f2f7e354070af62185262ec07a5e0156bc38cf83d59adf06664fd0be04355c4a9b0449c6efe415277520ce0cc044c88487d0e"
}