I guess I'm still not following why Core decided to do this. Why open up this battle right now, was anyone actually asking for this? This just seems like a tactical error on Core's part, or theres something that they are trying to distract us from like covenants or something.
I don't see the upside for them, and it seems like the end result is more implementations of Bitcoin will get support - which I'm okay with, because if the others get some traction I would think they would all need to be somewhat in agreement on the big things or risk a fork. MAD for changes to Bitcoin.
BaronBurdock
npub1u6…sq7z8
2025-05-04 20:15:28
in reply to nevent1q…a8yl
Author Public Key
npub1u6j0u5aakylx0qp2wl8g0rmvfhhlp4vdl8f3g23n8wfqgx4faw5qvsq7z8Published at
2025-05-04 20:15:28Event JSON
{
"id": "9907a7d56c8a1bd98182bb5ab3ae519c08882847b6464dc98d1d8d178888fbd1",
"pubkey": "e6a4fe53bdb13e67802a77ce878f6c4deff0d58df9d3142a333b92041aa9eba8",
"created_at": 1746389728,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"275eb9e0dc69d43195c7fdd65df04acb0d0e7f5d36449d5e817631b3521809b2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"50de492cfe5472450df1a0176fdf6d915e97cb5d9f8d3eccef7d25ff0a8871de"
]
],
"content": "I guess I'm still not following why Core decided to do this. Why open up this battle right now, was anyone actually asking for this? This just seems like a tactical error on Core's part, or theres something that they are trying to distract us from like covenants or something. \n\nI don't see the upside for them, and it seems like the end result is more implementations of Bitcoin will get support - which I'm okay with, because if the others get some traction I would think they would all need to be somewhat in agreement on the big things or risk a fork. MAD for changes to Bitcoin.",
"sig": "7abba9d45e51e7fe10ba6c430c294c17ccd6601326eb898a3071b2ae9cbef7555f379108d79ab6f51b2405b5738bb7c4342d3778eecdd2ed2dac2fb9bb658709"
}