Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: π
Original date posted:2013-11-02 π Original message:On Sunday, November 03, ...
π
Original date posted:2013-11-02
π Original message:On Sunday, November 03, 2013 1:19:51 AM Allen Piscitello wrote:
> I actually had a use case in my case where it was possible, and that was
> the check I used to get around it, just configured it so that I always
> generated a new key when I needed to set up a 2 of 2 Multisig Refund Tx.
> It was either that or making sure I had no unspent outputs. The use case
> of doing it was laziness in just creating a single key.
Use cases mean an actual use, not mere laziness. Bitcoin as a system has
always required a unique EC key (and address) for each transaction.
Luke
Published at
2023-06-07 15:08:29Event JSON
{
"id": "991d0c6996d744a590f5b96beafd54320d86cb007732f939d7b43ce5a33cfe66",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686150509,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"724c6f13ca667850218ef24a7051f9062418fb5d7bd972070be69e4bf08accba",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1ba5475fd42d5397eb9b1616ce987d2888c361d6cb3d5c3afa407b506f365132",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3327325c47cd736ff7b6960a646e8e38456e62cb2aa3cee04ac2560680ca8a3c"
]
],
"content": "π
Original date posted:2013-11-02\nπ Original message:On Sunday, November 03, 2013 1:19:51 AM Allen Piscitello wrote:\n\u003e I actually had a use case in my case where it was possible, and that was\n\u003e the check I used to get around it, just configured it so that I always\n\u003e generated a new key when I needed to set up a 2 of 2 Multisig Refund Tx.\n\u003e It was either that or making sure I had no unspent outputs. The use case\n\u003e of doing it was laziness in just creating a single key.\n\nUse cases mean an actual use, not mere laziness. Bitcoin as a system has \nalways required a unique EC key (and address) for each transaction.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "caf77303083cdee81831073682ae913da4f1c5e523b43f7a860233e708c90d5c41350746cf6060ed5903642b02ee78b9aebfe788857d86bcf233c2f52aa208bb"
}