Michael Gronager [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-05-27 📝 Original message:Commenting on my own ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-05-27
📝 Original message:Commenting on my own mail...
Rereading the BIP, it occurs to me that the private derivation is
actually intentional. So:
(m/i/j/k)*G = (M/i/j/k), but (m/i'/j/k)*G <> (M/i/j/k) (M/i'/j/k => ERROR)
But: ((m/i')*G)/j/k = (m/i'/j/k)*G
So, the motivation for the private derivation is to avoid the known (K,
c) and known k_i => k known too! I fear that many will fall in this
trap, though...
/Michael
Published at
2023-06-07 15:02:29Event JSON
{
"id": "9b826604b08cbda5b5378672dbb8b4b559ad3e6dd8ac6f0b322f2fdae374f082",
"pubkey": "9e3c76fd7eb862ca37f150391debc7baa4f8423eaa3f894c476a7d4360de9a02",
"created_at": 1686150149,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2fa56bdb32cf81261b0dc706ba4e177553eae555a4ac81f318abfd182b69b622",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"04b4e25e234df17b4a72ff103a532f228ed4fc9f79e357ea99972981a8756642",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9e3c76fd7eb862ca37f150391debc7baa4f8423eaa3f894c476a7d4360de9a02"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-05-27\n📝 Original message:Commenting on my own mail...\n\nRereading the BIP, it occurs to me that the private derivation is\nactually intentional. So:\n(m/i/j/k)*G = (M/i/j/k), but (m/i'/j/k)*G \u003c\u003e (M/i/j/k) (M/i'/j/k =\u003e ERROR)\n\nBut: ((m/i')*G)/j/k = (m/i'/j/k)*G\n\nSo, the motivation for the private derivation is to avoid the known (K,\nc) and known k_i =\u003e k known too! I fear that many will fall in this\ntrap, though...\n\n/Michael",
"sig": "5171b7b9af1d747aff7fc34012114e831689af4125d04729b0045d4f690e723ce05098eb75a7665d88ac78ae7e2ad1481df5e6b0bc14dcb6231450d200486da9"
}