Bitrefill's "yellow box" if you send with "rbf enabled":
"The transaction you sent has Replace By Fee (RBF) enabled.
This means that we need to wait for one on-chain confirmation of this order. Consider turning RBF off for 0-confirmation processing in the future."
Nothing but respect for the several excellent bitrefill people I have met over the years, but ... I would politely suggest that bitrefill considers facing reality, instead of me "considering turning rbf off", as if that actually changes the security model.
(To be clear I am not grumpy-posting because this bothers me or affects me in any way. I don't act in a way where it matters to me).
waxwing /
npub1va…knuu7
2023-08-03 15:30:55
Author Public Key
npub1vadcfln4ugt2h9ruwsuwu5vu5am4xaka7pw6m7axy79aqyhp6u5q9knuu7Published at
2023-08-03 15:30:55Event JSON
{
"id": "9b858dae0091cc974592b97d19964c77605349cf0788288bb807d7bb70257ac2",
"pubkey": "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
"created_at": 1691076655,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Bitrefill's \"yellow box\" if you send with \"rbf enabled\":\n\n\"The transaction you sent has Replace By Fee (RBF) enabled.\n\nThis means that we need to wait for one on-chain confirmation of this order. Consider turning RBF off for 0-confirmation processing in the future.\"\n\nNothing but respect for the several excellent bitrefill people I have met over the years, but ... I would politely suggest that bitrefill considers facing reality, instead of me \"considering turning rbf off\", as if that actually changes the security model.\n\n(To be clear I am not grumpy-posting because this bothers me or affects me in any way. I don't act in a way where it matters to me).\n",
"sig": "a2b4581e8fbde55ede00c8f3291af6d35c918f331f4dff6b6c0da362d5f3051cffd9a7f7017e731bc507812d301e6dd714ff265f9e783bbd146c0c9d2edc6ca7"
}