📅 Original date posted:2015-08-27
📝 Original message:Rusty Russell 於 2015-08-26 23:08 寫到:
> - We should immediately deploy an IsStandard() rule which insists that
> nSequence is 0xFFFFFFFF or 0, so nobody screws themselves when we
> soft fork and they had random junk in there.
This is not needed because BIP68 is not active for version 1 tx. No
existing wallet would be affected.
>
> Aside: I'd also like to have nLockTime apply even if nSequence !=
> 0xFFFFFFFF (another mistake I made). So I'd like an IsStandard() rule
> to say it nLockTime be 0 if an nSequence != 0xFFFFFFFF. Would that
> screw anyone currently?
Do you mean "have nLockTime apply even if nSequence = 0xFFFFFFFF"? This
is a softfork. Should we do this together with BIP65, BIP68 and BIP112?
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
jl2012 at xbt.hk [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kc…wjfw4
2023-06-07 15:46:54
in reply to nevent1q…lju5
Author Public Key
npub1kc0zulxt7j4a0ayhzhrz7jk84y7tm4026qcky7w97hlfkxxap24qnwjfw4Published at
2023-06-07 15:46:54Event JSON
{
"id": "9bdc4ef88dde63bda4a3eef7902cee4e2727190be2134ba98e7f563d51aa65a8",
"pubkey": "b61e2e7ccbf4abd7f49715c62f4ac7a93cbdd5ead0316279c5f5fe9b18dd0aaa",
"created_at": 1686152814,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6086ec24c7436956a4324b488abdb6aa06edbf1e682d11a0a5b70b6f8e62e6f3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c0040f69fcc5dab856c3b4078f435ec46b1fb1362d07c849c018873118cfcc17",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d3574a24208f4e3d0821bb4a69a0c3ae842043d444fa5c4a8c49c369918a6fb2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-27\n📝 Original message:Rusty Russell 於 2015-08-26 23:08 寫到:\n\u003e - We should immediately deploy an IsStandard() rule which insists that\n\u003e nSequence is 0xFFFFFFFF or 0, so nobody screws themselves when we\n\u003e soft fork and they had random junk in there.\n\nThis is not needed because BIP68 is not active for version 1 tx. No \nexisting wallet would be affected.\n\n\u003e \n\u003e Aside: I'd also like to have nLockTime apply even if nSequence !=\n\u003e 0xFFFFFFFF (another mistake I made). So I'd like an IsStandard() rule\n\u003e to say it nLockTime be 0 if an nSequence != 0xFFFFFFFF. Would that\n\u003e screw anyone currently?\n\nDo you mean \"have nLockTime apply even if nSequence = 0xFFFFFFFF\"? This \nis a softfork. Should we do this together with BIP65, BIP68 and BIP112?\n\n\n\u003e Thanks,\n\u003e Rusty.",
"sig": "cf276773429c6f1e86124d2424b0a57eab19ee92e65e3790fb019d1e4848fd183f8e56b19612249fd865ba31675a0771d29edd55d16529dec69ebdbcb9e4dae1"
}