Event JSON
{
"id": "9433b0aae46cc9354eb7a85697948bfa1b6606a62a13db4aba9450d25e95e178",
"pubkey": "fa4fb7eb0f2eadd8273ca04ad152b470f323068cdc324647d29b09b8aaf88e8b",
"created_at": 1746284573,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"92b85cdceabad2874af61a827c8836605c89d85d382f1015faa68bf87e7e4ec7",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"4281992e6b61652a04904c2738fe083037452becdd2b1e4995fc31db721b429a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"8983910d40033827eaa80138b2469022daa54d76e7eced5e37328318e4e48c9f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://det.social/users/jlink/statuses/114444505789726557",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqj2u9eh82htfgwjhkr2p8ezpkvpwgnkza8qh3q906569lsln7fmrsw0fv4z The experience with summaries of my own texts is that, indeed, there is little bullshit, but often the core of my argument is either left out or becomes a side issue in the summary. The trivial points, often from the introduction or prior art section, will be overly stressed. A good summary should IMO be the other way round.",
"sig": "99a53977fde1bb2b47625661d06cdc6d05b933f0cced66e643f8067c5aaf74522da76bfad7993a29349efd3671c35c9fb3e85c0221a9e86fb83b066f37f28e4b"
}