📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18
📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
>> And allegations that the project is "run like wikipedia" or "an edit war"
>> are verifyably untrue.
>> Check the commit history.
>
> This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin
> were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he
> would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so!
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37pv74/gavin_andresen_moves_ahead_with_push_for_bigger/croxw9o?context=1
This is the only reddit comment I've made using the word revert in
recent memory, so I know you couldn't be referring to another.
>> I was recently in a situation similar to what Gavin is in insofar as a design dispute that could improperly solved by a git push. I'm pretty impressed he hasn't given in and done a midnight push. It's cool to see him back channeling support.
> Such a change would be immediately reverted.
And, I probably should have continued "and resulted with an immediate
revocation of commit rights on the assumption that his account had
been compromised."
There is nothing controversial about that.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 15:38:27
in reply to nevent1q…4gsj
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:38:27Event JSON
{
"id": "947e2f6b9f9f56b06507871a63b05a1fde365d825643968ae44d149668707e8e",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686152307,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"23c1bb2f25b9e7356b48aa2a86751c4f26fb3977b440917a1cb3512c200b0b2f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e9a832fedde9ecbe7a85d77c8a84da92ba2d3f53313c9d36f46b830a7ed99857",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e And allegations that the project is \"run like wikipedia\" or \"an edit war\"\n\u003e\u003e are verifyably untrue.\n\u003e\u003e Check the commit history.\n\u003e\n\u003e This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin\n\u003e were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he\n\u003e would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so!\n\nhttp://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37pv74/gavin_andresen_moves_ahead_with_push_for_bigger/croxw9o?context=1\n\nThis is the only reddit comment I've made using the word revert in\nrecent memory, so I know you couldn't be referring to another.\n\n\u003e\u003e I was recently in a situation similar to what Gavin is in insofar as a design dispute that could improperly solved by a git push. I'm pretty impressed he hasn't given in and done a midnight push. It's cool to see him back channeling support.\n\u003e Such a change would be immediately reverted.\n\nAnd, I probably should have continued \"and resulted with an immediate\nrevocation of commit rights on the assumption that his account had\nbeen compromised.\"\n\nThere is nothing controversial about that.",
"sig": "38bb8d7efa10cd395a75266826fc26a9fcfecbbfd948a6cb29019a408c08e1775b84d0f0580803800119c48849b609a6dd6a78d37460349d0a8b3fb6d486c3a0"
}