nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtkxrms5s56y2a2wlvkvl84vtz06mde0w4j7avemyq5wsg0699lfq4kljvd (nprofile…ljvd)
>opportunist first and foremost
Trump, but in the same way I can just dismiss your Salon article.
>It is not self-hate
It often is. Or empathy one should have for children misplaced towards "oppressed" people. There is no pragmatic reason for subsidizing an unproductive group (ever growing if you consider the entire world), while also opposing ways of filtering out the productive ones.
>So because someone is engaging in racially motivated crime, you're blaming White liberals?
I'm not the best at expressing myself, but there's no way you can reasonably interpret my reply like that
>They play one group against the other all the time!
You're saying it like that makes it better
>this is sociology 1-0-1.
I know, you can't say that after claiming DEI is pragmatic.
>in your mind, Trumpian nepotism is better than DEI
From the start I've said it's same or worse depending on the angle.
>You think Trumpian nepotism is "neutral"
It's racially neutral. The criteria is "How many yes'es you can say", not "Are you non white"
>So you're saying a "pro-White" presidency is naturally not meritocratic in any way?
Explicitly pro-white implies racism so yes.
>Also, being "pro-White" is also an ideology, just like being pro-DEI
yes, that's why it's bad.
But being against anti-white racism isn't being pro-white
>The whole argument for being "pro-White" was a "return to meritocracy". Hundreds of articles were written about this.
No? The racial identarians don't want a meritocracy, because it doesn't benefit whites 100%.
>Import turd world ideas, become the turd world, no?
Guarding against thirdworldism isn't importing thirdworld ideas.
Many of the failures of capitalism (like expensive housing) are actually just a consequence of government policy. Or don't event matter (like inequality).
matrix07012 :thotpatrol: /
npub189…qh2dh
2025-04-06 17:59:17
in reply to nevent1q…9c2f
Author Public Key
npub1894zdwe2d3y59jfe8z5kk99ltnu50n7sv2g7g344rq5epwh0llts9qh2dhPublished at
2025-04-06 17:59:17Event JSON
{
"id": "94ba2e1dd7e7a921fc28a1eb04c12d66c203f9848d72ef7cc3f1ec518f1f785f",
"pubkey": "396a26bb2a6c4942c93938a96b14bf5cf947cfd06291e446b5182990baefffd7",
"created_at": 1743962357,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"5d8c3dc290a688aea9df6599f3d58b13f5b6e5eeacbdd66764051d043f452fd2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"d35793208c680e96c12bc3fddba575f78d2dfd7d092c9d0fa036d4de8dfe2792",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"238433a5caf164a154baf0cbe0a53acee90a37d483504e375c8b8252168b71fc",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://gameliberty.club/users/matrix/statuses/114292317057101351",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtkxrms5s56y2a2wlvkvl84vtz06mde0w4j7avemyq5wsg0699lfq4kljvd \n\u003eopportunist first and foremost\nTrump, but in the same way I can just dismiss your Salon article.\n\n\u003eIt is not self-hate\nIt often is. Or empathy one should have for children misplaced towards \"oppressed\" people. There is no pragmatic reason for subsidizing an unproductive group (ever growing if you consider the entire world), while also opposing ways of filtering out the productive ones.\n\n\u003eSo because someone is engaging in racially motivated crime, you're blaming White liberals?\nI'm not the best at expressing myself, but there's no way you can reasonably interpret my reply like that\n\n\u003eThey play one group against the other all the time! \nYou're saying it like that makes it better\n\n\u003ethis is sociology 1-0-1.\nI know, you can't say that after claiming DEI is pragmatic.\n\n\u003ein your mind, Trumpian nepotism is better than DEI\nFrom the start I've said it's same or worse depending on the angle.\n\n\u003eYou think Trumpian nepotism is \"neutral\"\nIt's racially neutral. The criteria is \"How many yes'es you can say\", not \"Are you non white\"\n\n\u003eSo you're saying a \"pro-White\" presidency is naturally not meritocratic in any way? \nExplicitly pro-white implies racism so yes.\n\n\u003eAlso, being \"pro-White\" is also an ideology, just like being pro-DEI\nyes, that's why it's bad.\nBut being against anti-white racism isn't being pro-white\n\n\u003eThe whole argument for being \"pro-White\" was a \"return to meritocracy\". Hundreds of articles were written about this.\nNo? The racial identarians don't want a meritocracy, because it doesn't benefit whites 100%.\n\n\u003eImport turd world ideas, become the turd world, no?\nGuarding against thirdworldism isn't importing thirdworld ideas.\n\nMany of the failures of capitalism (like expensive housing) are actually just a consequence of government policy. Or don't event matter (like inequality).",
"sig": "a5b0128bbfae31a87c0e11f58e51b13b0f6a5d7a584d27a529c73d42515e52003bb7399e7ff2eda20c25b7c63fe75d23373f881de1cb8137b1ee8c99f3228ca5"
}