Event JSON
{
"id": "94a6660a7de33aff47716b21f9be2933ff68be2bb94f04adbe7c3bdef06114b1",
"pubkey": "db40c66ad2236a56a2a890dbcb5d0213eee37793434e427bbd68c113731ceb76",
"created_at": 1691851642,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d081ac8de72d3348c7838d3266a44d2c061bec9dda3129e2df7fecab1d2fd722",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"0971936e07d3fda69abb1f6f390a5116d08a33390f4914b3d7dfc6d4a0e1cfb4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"d16a91ad7d44809f955d8cec430b9319fa1a960bfc12513e98320345fef6ba65",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://sigmoid.social/users/at/statuses/110877189225966186",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub16zq6er0895e533ur35exdfzd9srphmyamgcjnckl0lk2k8f06u3q0ey45e Ah yeah, that is something I am also not so sure of. I tend to not read anything from Hindawi, reviews should* have lots of citations, if it is 10 years old with only 10 citations, I get suspicious. \n\nThere was one paper where the authors kept on encouraging the use of this particular thing, the author group created it. So that's similar to our research, watch out for self-citation / promotion. \n\nIt seems that Elsevier \u0026 Springer are going strong in the medical field.",
"sig": "c3330e6c2d5025555b3e23b598c575ffad385bd66e2cc12a8493a636d7088944754447f65dbd98e8d28283f7c0aa4459753808f74e678e1c38bfca7c5b5ecea0"
}