Gregorio Guidi [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-09-12 📝 Original message: Il 12 settembre 2018 ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-09-12
📝 Original message:
Il 12 settembre 2018 06:40:27 CEST, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> ha scritto:
>
>> Don't you agree with me, that right now there is no good way to
>initiate such receiving channel? Don't you think this is quite high
>weakness of LN?
>
>No. People who have kept their node consistently online for a few
>months generally find that they get incoming capacity anyway; you can
>simply trade off between time and money in this case.
Hello, if I may add another perspective on this issue: from the point of view of a routing node, it is advantageous to be as close as possible to as much merchants as possibile, to capture part of the flow of funds to them.
Therefore, when a new merchant appears, I actually see the possibility of some competition between routing nodes to fund stable channels with them. This could turn the incoming capacity issue perhaps into a non-issue in the steady state.
Regards,
Gregorio
Published at
2023-06-09 12:51:28Event JSON
{
"id": "9cfeaaad8c8806c6e1a0bdc0052ef42203126d0f486ff503b7d8c336d269c7d2",
"pubkey": "a10fbe22e99c203f0bda8ffcadf4e164d61ced01d0849839506e550e8862013a",
"created_at": 1686315088,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"277b325305809d9971f79d13ef233e221ea6b464c99ddfe1b21372fa7bc5fe35",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d608bd116274fac09aabc3557871f2a34ef1fdb30c09001b18ee97e000ca375d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-09-12\n📝 Original message:\nIl 12 settembre 2018 06:40:27 CEST, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev \u003clightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e ha scritto:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Don't you agree with me, that right now there is no good way to\n\u003einitiate such receiving channel? Don't you think this is quite high\n\u003eweakness of LN?\n\u003e\n\u003eNo. People who have kept their node consistently online for a few\n\u003emonths generally find that they get incoming capacity anyway; you can\n\u003esimply trade off between time and money in this case.\n\nHello, if I may add another perspective on this issue: from the point of view of a routing node, it is advantageous to be as close as possible to as much merchants as possibile, to capture part of the flow of funds to them.\n\nTherefore, when a new merchant appears, I actually see the possibility of some competition between routing nodes to fund stable channels with them. This could turn the incoming capacity issue perhaps into a non-issue in the steady state.\n\nRegards,\nGregorio",
"sig": "f6314292080f4cd719f47301e36ca4b725f61c30e8e83ff7d632be700b567af7c079362064efbee41e5b3b8b7c45a8b3c8f561376427f20287e0cb09ca3077bf"
}