Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-14 📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-14
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> The softfork argument I find the most compelling, though it's tempting
> to argue that every ordering use (including SIGHASH_SINGLE) is likely
> a mistake.
Oh.
Hm.
It is the case that the generalized sighash flag design I was thinking
about was actually completely neutral about ordering, and yet still
replaced SINGLE.
I need to think a bit on that.
Published at
2023-06-07 15:36:44Event JSON
{
"id": "9cfd5b665be7b2f2a73dbf17b4867a0987e5698cf5fbd72320a4a7f6baf4c0da",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686152204,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"981f41da2a008fa33b1384e8dd3f0d4a96b7f3bed5c463f00f9032a495226e9c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"50c8e2f26f6b6c1752e3feb08a30fdf24b3325f08bd6e6bb9e8e0cb62a497889",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-14\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\u003e The softfork argument I find the most compelling, though it's tempting\n\u003e to argue that every ordering use (including SIGHASH_SINGLE) is likely\n\u003e a mistake.\n\nOh.\n\nHm.\n\nIt is the case that the generalized sighash flag design I was thinking\nabout was actually completely neutral about ordering, and yet still\nreplaced SINGLE.\n\nI need to think a bit on that.",
"sig": "97b394f96bab006cc9df4004e73a213d4da33c47218972e5cff2f59c3a6ff747f89fe72ff0f9f8b5b2fb57eb85b8c7882f659ccc6dd090ab2061e9994c045cd5"
}