Chrys on Nostr: Watching the Andrew Wilson v. Dave Smith debate on Libertarian vs. Christian ...
Watching the Andrew Wilson v. Dave Smith debate on Libertarian vs. Christian Populism.
Its interesting, Dave came in and should have asked for a conversation.
Andrew Wilson is keeping with a "Libertine" perspective of Libertarianism. I'd never debate since I'd rather not conversate as adversaries.
AnCap is a LEGAL SYSTEM, not a MORAL SYSTEM. Self Ownership is not a Moral axiom, its a Legal Axiom.
Laws are necessary when living in a world of scarce resources, so we need Laws, but to equate legal with moral is absurd.
I'm a fan of both of them, they both forgot that Debates are not suppose to be to convince the opposing debater. This would have been better as a conversation.
Published at
2024-06-08 01:48:37Event JSON
{
"id": "96870496be207273235b68bb54d7a8215a900d5b3f0da12f5a4df94809b23af8",
"pubkey": "e1cb41c9e2f8394a0d6933497d639a9c0d7c58a00009c5c419d22c951a4b61d8",
"created_at": 1717811317,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Watching the Andrew Wilson v. Dave Smith debate on Libertarian vs. Christian Populism.\n\nIts interesting, Dave came in and should have asked for a conversation.\n\nAndrew Wilson is keeping with a \"Libertine\" perspective of Libertarianism. I'd never debate since I'd rather not conversate as adversaries.\n\nAnCap is a LEGAL SYSTEM, not a MORAL SYSTEM. Self Ownership is not a Moral axiom, its a Legal Axiom.\n\nLaws are necessary when living in a world of scarce resources, so we need Laws, but to equate legal with moral is absurd.\n\nI'm a fan of both of them, they both forgot that Debates are not suppose to be to convince the opposing debater. This would have been better as a conversation.",
"sig": "f9a0cca1d5e202c8d377ed16ddf30188e6f522ac10f40b79db99d00ee13e8a7792eacca0318b2e4ef7bd16d09474e54a877b2830ed73d635934e295fe16a2e73"
}