Concord Music Group v. X, from March, is the most persuasive attempt I've seen to reconcile volitional conduct with Aereo. It also has some holdings that might shift the law on contributory and vicarious infringement. This is one to watch as the case proceeds. Jury trial is set for September 2026, though, so it might be a while.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.tnmd.94999/gov.uscourts.tnmd.94999.90.0_1.pdf
James Grimmelmann /
npub1me…56hg8
2024-06-11 19:05:17
Author Public Key
npub1mehtl0g8g3kcgpcwg9nc27yft99mfautjecvhqq04e0ychpqa4nqd56hg8Published at
2024-06-11 19:05:17Event JSON
{
"id": "9c40e1483879fd28e31c020e2af8f14c7dbfa52b076de4a0999a425019c91aa1",
"pubkey": "de6ebfbd07446d84070e4167857889594bb4f78b9670cb800fae5e4c5c20ed66",
"created_at": 1718132717,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/jtlg/statuses/112599545768438876",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Concord Music Group v. X, from March, is the most persuasive attempt I've seen to reconcile volitional conduct with Aereo. It also has some holdings that might shift the law on contributory and vicarious infringement. This is one to watch as the case proceeds. Jury trial is set for September 2026, though, so it might be a while.\n\nhttps://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.tnmd.94999/gov.uscourts.tnmd.94999.90.0_1.pdf",
"sig": "db574b91123d4e8ffba98d8d7fc14c8e4361a99cc82b6bb2587cc58bf052ebdc79fe8f4eba1610bff399122992260f7a1ce48548da72a573886399e59fea7030"
}