Yes, I agree with that statement. It currently helps me or in other words, I try to think about things in the order described in the post. Free speech, non-agression, voluntaryism. That's the gist of my philosophy.
And thus I of course understand and absolutely sympathise with how some people think ideas are mixed up in the end. For example, some libertarians are libertarians because they are Christian and thus they believe in the individuality of man as a right that comes from God. Natural rights. And that's fine too. Why wouldn't it be? If we reach the same conclusions and act in the same way, is there really a difference, in a libertarian context?
A part of me also thinks it's all mixed up in the end. I mean, what do I really know about anything? In other words, people came to the same conclusions from different places. And that's perfectly fine in my view 😉
I know this is a very sensitive topic that nobody wants to touch. It's for the brave of heart only. But it also doesn't have to be.
In case of confusion, I would say being kind and compassionate to each other always works because that's never a bad thing. 😃 AND of course we should also buy more Bitcoin. Always. 😉
Thanks for the response by the way!
CitizenLocke
npub1v2…cetnt
2024-02-08 14:02:23
in reply to nevent1q…wel3
Author Public Key
npub1v2n2g830p7pzgkrzzk7wyxudfvw87svxyt3dgahrj7xa4vf2edpsscetntPublished at
2024-02-08 14:02:23Event JSON
{
"id": "9c35d877a8c2a15c94a7fc4ecc2f0924f049790de41fd80e56b839bb3273fa4a",
"pubkey": "62a6a41e2f0f8224586215bce21b8d4b1c7f418622e2d476e3978ddab12acb43",
"created_at": 1707400943,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8e7edef0bc14e9d74bf360aca2f9f49fb6f22c95c909a38b596d1353ae249932",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3db75bed68aa96c94798e8a9df863fefc6494801168b8590a2e420fc74359b16",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"aad8a9458e3de1c0f3fcf6e4b7a830dc86108a32a0b16ef325d482cbf7bfd3a8",
"wss://relay.plebstr.com/",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Yes, I agree with that statement. It currently helps me or in other words, I try to think about things in the order described in the post. Free speech, non-agression, voluntaryism. That's the gist of my philosophy.\n\nAnd thus I of course understand and absolutely sympathise with how some people think ideas are mixed up in the end. For example, some libertarians are libertarians because they are Christian and thus they believe in the individuality of man as a right that comes from God. Natural rights. And that's fine too. Why wouldn't it be? If we reach the same conclusions and act in the same way, is there really a difference, in a libertarian context?\n\nA part of me also thinks it's all mixed up in the end. I mean, what do I really know about anything? In other words, people came to the same conclusions from different places. And that's perfectly fine in my view 😉 \n\nI know this is a very sensitive topic that nobody wants to touch. It's for the brave of heart only. But it also doesn't have to be. \n\nIn case of confusion, I would say being kind and compassionate to each other always works because that's never a bad thing. 😃 AND of course we should also buy more Bitcoin. Always. 😉 \n\nThanks for the response by the way!",
"sig": "446e1263a4e527c2c430a2e22b06af6cfbde2f8f2fef5aa5261a35f4de7c4ba4544e84e5bab08348b416abfb2c64673f32b1feb601fed1153a3dc86e5e2dbea6"
}