🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 on Nostr: #[0] so in terms of receipts you have two categories here... One is not receipts at ...
npub1ttkqmpglj0t5h5r3t4xj5sdl7vezj03k7rp42h4jqkxlwsrgc0qqxfx6r5 (npub1ttk…x6r5) so in terms of receipts you have two categories here...
One is not receipts at all, like the attached screenshot, it is literally someone making accusations and a screenshot of that. That is not a receipt.
The joepie "receipt" is closer to being a receipt, its a screenshot of something i said at least. But it was also exposed as being a lie as it intentionally left out content to manipulate my response, which i replied to that link with thr full receipt. Lets break down that receipt shall we:
I woukd ask if i woukd defederate with child porn. I said no one had ever reported child porn so it wasnt an issue that had came up before... i immediately brought it up to the moderators at qoto and within 30 minutes got a preemptive rulling ton child porn and within moments of being asked the question we made a rulling and updated our ToS to address child porn and prohibit it. So within minutes in that same conversation i updated them as to our policy... that was of course left out of the screenshots andni have provided them.
Now ask yourself why did a server provide receipts that intentionally left out such an important response in the thread, a response that completely changes the receipt.
Do you really think receipts so blatantly manipulated and dishonest without showing important details and rejecting them when presented has any place on a publictly curated and adopted list? Does that really even count as a receipt when its so blatantly manipulated out of context?
Published at
2023-04-25 07:33:19Event JSON
{
"id": "9c537bc7562f53d3ca7b08d3b7f83302a61d5b1cc2626409f82f2727a7ec6986",
"pubkey": "12da98a3a66fb47b43526b1b241e91df632bfd4058dc5364938dc932fe931118",
"created_at": 1682407999,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"5aec0d851f93d74bd0715d4d2a41bff332293e36f0c3555eb2058df74068c3c0",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3b44ffd67bbf2122bc38912bc7277504e4c159dd8c8720ad006455f6e2dd6990",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"da400f218e3bf2f6cce6fa4b02fb5f4d84083c682aaeb4257bc2af3cc3f2a7c8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"content-warning",
"re: Announcing the Oliphant Social BlocklistS (plural!)"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://qoto.org/users/freemo/statuses/110258290633389857"
]
],
"content": "#[0] so in terms of receipts you have two categories here...\n\nOne is not receipts at all, like the attached screenshot, it is literally someone making accusations and a screenshot of that. That is not a receipt. \n\nThe joepie \"receipt\" is closer to being a receipt, its a screenshot of something i said at least. But it was also exposed as being a lie as it intentionally left out content to manipulate my response, which i replied to that link with thr full receipt. Lets break down that receipt shall we:\n\nI woukd ask if i woukd defederate with child porn. I said no one had ever reported child porn so it wasnt an issue that had came up before... i immediately brought it up to the moderators at qoto and within 30 minutes got a preemptive rulling ton child porn and within moments of being asked the question we made a rulling and updated our ToS to address child porn and prohibit it. So within minutes in that same conversation i updated them as to our policy... that was of course left out of the screenshots andni have provided them.\n\nNow ask yourself why did a server provide receipts that intentionally left out such an important response in the thread, a response that completely changes the receipt.\n\nDo you really think receipts so blatantly manipulated and dishonest without showing important details and rejecting them when presented has any place on a publictly curated and adopted list? Does that really even count as a receipt when its so blatantly manipulated out of context?",
"sig": "842a3524654722ac01c0515c431c24eac0286aa6808977942afa1f4e9c1ff828281bec52566dd0fc24cc99318bee102f839aef6d3489852b919c4d8234930abc"
}