Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-08-07 📝 Original message:> I'd like to hear from ...

📅 Original date posted:2013-08-07
📝 Original message:> I'd like to hear from other wallet implementors. Do you have a notion
> of 'locked inputs' ? The tricky bit in constructing a transaction but
> not broadcasting it right away is the inputs must be locked, so
> they're not accidentally double-spent.
>

bitcoinj separates the concept of committing a tx to the wallet from
broadcasting it. However by default transactions that weren't seen in the
chain yet will be announced when a new peer is connected to. It'd take
extra code to suppress that, and it's unclear to me why that's useful. I
agree with Pieter that it should be the merchants responsibility to get the
tx out there, but having the client do the broadcast as well can't really
hurt (except perhaps some privacy impact).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130807/1951a1d0/attachment.html>;